Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Then went inside with the curtain rods  (Read 431789 times)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #854 on: March 18, 2021, 10:59:25 PM »
Dan's sarcastic strawman arguments are tedious.

But entertaining in their desperate ineptitude!

Quote
Why was it called Ruth Paine exhibit 275 when she didn't have that many exhibits?  Perhaps that number was already written on the package that Ruth Paine had in her garage.  Perhaps it's just an uncanny coincidence that Howlett measured the curtain rod to be "2 feet 3 1/2 inches", or 27.5 inches.

Total fluke!

Another total fluke: Mr Frazier's estimate of the length of the package is one half of one inch off the length of the curtain rod

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #855 on: March 18, 2021, 11:46:34 PM »
But entertaining in their desperate ineptitude!

Total fluke!

Another total fluke: Mr Frazier's estimate of the length of the package is one half of one inch off the length of the curtain rod

Obviously a complete fluke because everybody knows that there was a 40-inch Mannlicher Carcano rifle in that package.

 ::)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #856 on: March 19, 2021, 12:57:55 AM »
A curtain rods fingerprint card from Lt Day. Note the date--------------------


Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #857 on: March 19, 2021, 01:17:03 AM »
On November 22 and 23, 1963, the Paine garage was, as one would expect, very thoroughly searched.............



As one would most certainly NOT expect, given the centrality of curtain rods to the Oswald case, not a single report anywhere mentions anything about curtain rods in that garage. The idea that no one thought of checking to see whether curtain rods were there is obviously quite ludicrous.

If Mr Oswald had brought no curtain rods to the Depository the morning of the assassination, the following would have happened:

ALL curtain rods in the garage before the assassination would have still been in the garage and would have been immediately found and recorded as having been found in the garage. Ms Paine would have been put on the record immediately as confirming that no curtain rods were missing. The world would have been told all about this crucial development in the Oswald-Did-It case.

Yet somehow none of this happened. Instead we get complete radio silence about curtain rods in the garage until March '64, when two curtain rods are extracted from the Paine garage----------EIGHT DAYS AFTER two curtain rods were submitted to the Crime Scene Search Section for testing for Mr Oswald's prints.

Go figure!

 Thumb1:
« Last Edit: March 19, 2021, 01:21:36 AM by Alan Ford »

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3992
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #858 on: March 19, 2021, 01:21:31 AM »
A curtain rods fingerprint card from Lt Day. Note the date--------------------



The rods were tested for prints the day after they were released to Howlett?


Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6130
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #859 on: March 19, 2021, 01:24:56 AM »
On November 22 and 23, 1963, the Paine garage was, as one would expect, very thoroughly searched.............



As one would most certainly NOT expect, given the centrality of curtain rods to the Oswald case, not a single report anywhere mentions anything about curtain rods in that garage.

If Mr Oswald had brought no curtain rods to the Depository the morning of the assassination, the following would have happened:

ALL curtain rods in the garage before the assassination would have still been in the garage and would have been immediately found and recorded as having been found in the garage. Ms Paine would have been put on the record immediately as confirming that no curtain rods were missing. The world would have been told all about this crucial development in the Oswald-Did-It case.

Instead we get 2 curtain rods submitted for testing for Mr Oswald's prints on 3/15/64, and then two curtain rods extracted from the Paine garage on 3/23/64.

Go figure!

 Thumb1:

Huh. Why would any curtain rods in the Paine garage been recorded at that point?  If they were noticed in the garage AFTER the assassination obviously they were in not in the bag taken by Oswald to the TSBD.  Months later in an exercise of due diligence once the curtain rod story was known the investigators took a closer look at them.  You are really grasping at fantasy straws.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #860 on: March 19, 2021, 01:27:50 AM »
The rods were tested for prints the day after they were released to Howlett?

No--------two rods were tested for prints the day after two rods were released to Agent Howlett.

Now, Mr O'Meara! You have claimed that the straightforward solution to this document-----------



------------is that the submission date is simply an error.

OK. What do you think the correct submission date might have been?