The same old tired contrarian game of ring around the rosie. They scoff at Oswald's having left his wedding ring and large amount of money with Marina on the morning of the assassination. In a complete vacuum if that were the only evidence and circumstance to link him to the crime, it might not be persuasive. Of course it is not the only evidence. Oswald made an unexpected trip to the Paine household on the night before the assassination. The place where Marina confirms that he kept his rifle. He carries a long package to work the next morning. His rifle is missing from the Paine residence when searched later that day. His rifle and fired bullet casings from his rifle are found at his place of employment where he was taken with his long bag that morning. He was seen to enter that building. His prints are on a long bag found next to the SN on the same floor as his rifle. Oswald flees the building and is implicated in the murder of a police officer within an hour. In the totality of all these circumstance, the wedding ring and money take on much greater significance. Only a contrarian fool would suggest that they are meaningless and analyze them in a complete void separate and apart from the totality of evidence. But that is why they are contrarians.
