Then went inside with the curtain rods

[Zeon Mason]

The only witness I can think of is Rowland Arnold describing the elderly
“negro” man at SE 5th foot window wearing a plaid shirt , red and green. The man  was probably Bonnie Ray Williams although it’s questionable if the young BRW could appear as elderly to Rowland because of dust fallen on his hair.

[John Iacoletti]

It's 'copy/paste' in the digital age, cowboy.

Thanks for yet another "clever, cut-to-the-quick insight".   

And you can 'supposed' what you like, JudgeJohnny.

Hilarious that you would bestow that moniker on me when it's you who has made the verdict in this case.  And with zero justification.

[John Iacoletti]

Handy Guide to Walt's Fabrications by John Iacoletti
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,99.msg1042.html#msg1042

Walt may make up some fanciful stories, but at least what he posts is coherent and relevant.

[John Iacoletti]

Unreal.  So the authorities suppressed Oswald's curtain rod story to begin with, brought them to light on their own motion months later, only to suppress them once again.  I can only marvel at the logical inconsistencies of this bizarre narrative.

What I marvel at is the complete inability of the WC apologists to explain how curtain rods were "found" in Ruth Paine's garage 8 days after they were submitted into evidence.  And furthermore that they don't even wonder.  Alan's theory may be speculative but at least he's trying to reconcile the discrepancy.

[John Iacoletti]

I ridicule ALL who disbelieve that Lee Harvey Oswald killed President Kennedy.  How can you deny the evidence?  It is overwhelming, sir+

Feel free to provide some of this "overwhelming evidence".

[Zeon Mason]

Correction to my earlier post. That’s Arnold Rowland

[John Iacoletti]

But we have the key information: the rods were submitted for testing for Mr Oswald's prints. This means they must have been found at a location that merited their being tested for Mr Oswald's prints. And the only such location I, you or anyone else can think of is the Depository. Because the evidentiary stakes of a fingerprint test on rods found anywhere else would be zero.

I'm not sure I can think of any evidentiary value of Oswald's prints being on curtain rods found anywhere.

[John Iacoletti]

You may not understand or accept this, but your "logic inference" strategy is commonly used by "I am right unless you can prove me wrong" LNs.

I have to agree.  It's just what "Richard" does when he asserts that his speculative narrative about the rifle is "evidence" and if you don't agree then the problem is your "standards of evidence", not his.