Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Then went inside with the curtain rods  (Read 90699 times)

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7408
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #424 on: February 11, 2021, 07:25:03 PM »
Advertisement
Again, Mr Weidmann, look at Ms Paine's Irving testimony session and ask the question: how exactly were the numbers 275 and 276 chosen as the exhibit numbers?

The two curtain rods submitted for fingerprint testing 3/15 were NOT the same as the two curtain rods extracted from Ms Paine's garage 3/23

An important clue is contained in the UNCANNY coincidence between the measurement ("2 feet 3 1/2 inches" = 27.5 inches) and the exhibit number (275).

Again, Mr Weidmann, look at Ms Paine's Irving testimony session and ask the question: how exactly were the numbers 275 and 276 chosen as the exhibit numbers?

Why don't you save me the time and simply tell me, Mr. Ford?

All I can see is that Jenner allocated the two numbers to the exhibits in a manner not uncommon to other numbers being allocated during testimony. It is beyond my knowledge if the WC had already prepared a list of exhibits. Given the fact that lawyers normally don't take testimony without being prepared and knowing the answers to the questions they are going to ask, it is possible that they knew about the two curtain rods in advance. However, someting being possible doesn't mean it's certain.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2021, 07:31:43 PM by Martin Weidmann »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #424 on: February 11, 2021, 07:25:03 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #425 on: February 11, 2021, 08:15:23 PM »
Says the guy who thought there was an "other Frazier" who threatened Buell Frazier.   :D

Are you sure I don't know who threatened Frazier, Tex?


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7408
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #426 on: February 11, 2021, 08:50:43 PM »
Are you sure I don't know who threatened Frazier, Tex?



All this shows is that you knew in 2018 that Fritz had threatend Buell Fazier, but that doesn't prove that you also knew that no man named Frazier had threatened Buell Frazier as you claimed recently.

Btw the desperate way you are trying to disprove something you said recently by a quote from 2018 that doesn't actually disprove anything suggests a massive need for recognition, which of course goes hand in hand with your similar desperation for attention.

Perhaps you should take it easy for a while.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #426 on: February 11, 2021, 08:50:43 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #427 on: February 11, 2021, 09:28:08 PM »
All this shows is that you knew in 2018 that Fritz had threatend Buell Fazier, but that doesn't prove that you also knew that no man named Frazier had threatened Buell Frazier as you claimed recently.

Btw the desperate way you are trying to disprove something you said recently by a quote from 2018 that doesn't actually disprove anything suggests a massive need for recognition, which of course goes hand in hand with your similar desperation for attention.

Perhaps you should take it easy for a while.

I read there was no other man in that interview but Fritz threatening Buell
And f'n with the timeline to make it look like I claimed otherwise recently is just another one of your slimy tricks
« Last Edit: February 11, 2021, 09:35:26 PM by Bill Chapman »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7408
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #428 on: February 11, 2021, 09:35:46 PM »
I read there was no other man in that interview but Fritz threatening Buell
And fn with the timeline to make it look like I claimed otherwise recently is just another one of your slimy tricks

So, when did Frazier threaten Buell Frazier, like you said he did?

And, if not recently, when was it then that you claimed Frazier had threatend Buell Frazier? Why not show us another screenshot?

Btw, I'm giving you a bit of the attention you so desperately want. Happy now?
« Last Edit: February 11, 2021, 09:38:34 PM by Martin Weidmann »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #428 on: February 11, 2021, 09:35:46 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #429 on: February 11, 2021, 10:13:15 PM »
So, when did Frazier threaten Buell Frazier, like you said he did?

And, if not recently, when was it then that you claimed Frazier had threatend Buell Frazier?* Why not show us another screenshot?

Btw, I'm giving you a bit of the attention you so desperately want. Happy now?

I'm always happy. And as long as I can still recognize myself in the mirror every morning, that's enough.


« Last Edit: February 11, 2021, 10:13:49 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #430 on: February 11, 2021, 10:35:46 PM »
------------
GLOSSARY
------------

‘your hero’s coffin’  =  Lee Harvey Oswald’s coffin
'the little prick’  =  Lee Harvey Oswald

I don't need a Chapman-to-English dictionary, but thank you for your always useful input, Chapman-lover.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2021, 10:45:53 PM by John Iacoletti »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #430 on: February 11, 2021, 10:35:46 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #431 on: February 11, 2021, 10:39:04 PM »
No need to go to any lengths to prosecute anybody here sport. This ain't a court of law despite to and your tag-team buddy desperately needing to pretend otherwise.

In Chapman-fantasy-land, all he has to do is declare somebody a killer (or a prick) and like magic it just becomes true.