Then went inside with the curtain rods

[Martin Weidmann]

You are still here?  What do you expect to happen?  You have posted this same form about a thousand times here.  We have had the same discussions many times over.  Move on to the NY Times or any other media outlet that you choose if you believe it proves a conspiracy.  Then get back to us with the results.  Good luck!

Still running from the discussion with your pathethic "tell it to the NY Times" BS, I see

Now why am I not surprised, contrarian?

[Richard Smith]

Still running from the discussion with your pathethic "tell it to the NY Times" BS, I see

Now why am I not surprised, contrarian?

Alan has posted this same form hundreds of times and asked the same question over and over.  I've provided a possible explanation.  I have nothing more to say on the matter.   No one else has chimed in.  What do you expect to happen now?  What is to be gained from just restating the same points over and over?  If he truly believes that he has "evidence" that proves a conspiracy to kill the president of the United States, he should take that evidence to the media or authorities in Texas.  Isn't that what a normal person would do if they actually thought that this form proved a conspiracy?

[Alan Ford]

Alan has posted this same form hundreds of times and asked the same question over and over.  I've provided a possible explanation.  I have nothing more to say on the matter.   No one else has chimed in.  What do you expect to happen now?  What is to be gained from just restating the same points over and over?  If he truly believes that he has "evidence" that proves a conspiracy to kill the president of the United States, he should take that evidence to the media or authorities in Texas.  Isn't that what a normal person would do if they actually thought that this form proved a conspiracy?

Let us know when you come up with a non-risible explanation for the document, Mr Smith! 

[Richard Smith]

Let us know when you come up with a non-risible explanation for the document, Mr Smith! 

Instead of just typing the same response over and over why not articulate what you want to happen?  You have posted that form at least a hundred times here.  We have had these exact same discussions many times.   If you actually believe that you were in possession of evidence of a conspiracy, it seems like the next logical step would be to bring that to the attention of the media or authorities.  But you appear unwilling to do so.  There are probably some other lines of research to pursue.  Did Howlett keep any notes?  Ruth Paine is still alive and responds to questions.  Maybe ask her if she recalls the sequence of events etc.

[Walt Cakebread]

Instead of just typing the same response over and over why not articulate what you want to happen?  You have posted that form at least a hundred times here.  We have had these exact same discussions many times.   If you actually believe that you were in possession of evidence of a conspiracy, it seems like the next logical step would be to bring that to the attention of the media or authorities.  But you appear unwilling to do so.  There are probably some other lines of research to pursue.  Did Howlett keep any notes?  Ruth Paine is still alive and responds to questions.  Maybe ask her if she recalls the sequence of events etc.

If you actually believe that you were in possession of evidence of a conspiracy, it seems like the next logical step would be to bring that to the attention of the media or authorities.

I know that you're serious , Mr "Smith"....And the fact that you'd suggest such a stupid and futile action reveals a very uncritical and  childlike, naive mind.   If you were being sexually abused by your father....would you take your case to your father?

[Alan Ford]

Instead of just typing the same response over and over why not articulate what you want to happen?  You have posted that form at least a hundred times here.  We have had these exact same discussions many times.   If you actually believe that you were in possession of evidence of a conspiracy, it seems like the next logical step would be to bring that to the attention of the media or authorities.  But you appear unwilling to do so.  There are probably some other lines of research to pursue.  Did Howlett keep any notes?  Ruth Paine is still alive and responds to questions.  Maybe ask her if she recalls the sequence of events etc.

If you had a non-risible explanation for the document you wouldn't be resorting to this inane argument

[Zeon Mason]

Substitute the word “placed” for the word “hide” and Oswald therefore placed his bag someplace in the loading dock area just before he entered the TSBD back door before BW Frazier follows some 30 seconds later .

BWF does state seeing Oswald carry a bag INTO the  back door. However  the door that BW Frazier referring  , is actually the back door of the attached roofed annex bldg , which is the enclosed part of the loading dock, and thus NOT the back door of the TSBD bldg., which is the 2nd door AFTER entering the loading dock annex bldg back door.