Then went inside with the curtain rods

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Then went inside with the curtain rods  (Read 367159 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #322 on: February 05, 2021, 01:10:49 AM »
You have a case?

Do you have a life, Mr Always Logged In?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #323 on: February 05, 2021, 01:29:49 AM »
Oswald bag for wrapping long thin books

That's not Oswald's bag. Buell Frazier, the only witness who saw the bag, denied on Friday evening 11/22/63 that this was not the bag he had seen Oswald carry and he is still saying the same thing to this day.

Stop making up stuff!

Randle also saw the bag.
Stop making stuff up.

The Long Brown Bag
Macadams

By Magen Knuth:

'So Frazier clearly was not paying attention to the package. He even stated in an affidavit that the bag from the Depository could have been the sack or package which he saw in the possession of Oswald on the morning of November 22, 1963, but that he does not feel he is in a position to definitely state that this original is or is not the sack"
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 01:53:45 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #324 on: February 05, 2021, 01:45:23 AM »
I heard War and Peace was a really long book.

Good one
But not thin
Maybe they ship scrolls to some clients

And maybe that's how they ship the word-salads CTers concoct when they  retreat to their endless whataboutisms

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #325 on: February 05, 2021, 01:48:32 AM »
This latest exercise in "clever" sarcasm is just as irrelevant as all of your other lame attempts.

Sure, Johnny, sure.

Now, careful you don't choke on all that hatred poring out of that big mouth of yours.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 02:00:52 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8212
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #326 on: February 05, 2021, 01:51:37 AM »
Randle also saw the bag.
Stop making stuff up.

The Long Brown Bag
Macadams

Magen Knuff:

'So Frazier clearly was not paying attention to the package. He even stated in an affidavit that the bag from the Depository could have been the sack or package which he saw in the possession of Oswald on the morning of November 22, 1963, but that he does not feel he is in a position to definitely state that this original is or is not the sack"

Bla bla bla... All you've got is opinions. Not a shred of evidence anywhere. Neither Buell Frazier or Randle ever identified the bag you are trying to pass off as Oswald's.

You are making stuff up and no quotes from MacAdams' propaganda site will ever change that.

If you want to claim that the bag you have shown was Oswald's bag, you need to prove it.... but you won't, because you can't.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 01:53:20 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #327 on: February 05, 2021, 02:03:37 AM »
This photo appears to have been taken for a weirdly........................ specific reason-----------------------



Was something found under this bench?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #328 on: February 05, 2021, 05:33:46 AM »
This latest exercise in "clever" sarcasm is just as irrelevant as all of your other lame attempts.

Oswald: I'm guilty. I killed Tippit and Kennedy.
JudgeJohnny: LOL!! PROVE IT!! THAT'S ONLY YOUR OPINION!! I WASN'T THERE TO SEE YOU KILL ANYBODY SO YOU CAN'T PROVE ANYTHING!! I'M GOING TO PISS ON YOUR GRAVE, YOU LITTLE PRICK!!
« Last Edit: February 06, 2021, 08:47:26 PM by Bill Chapman »