Then went inside with the curtain rods

[Bill Chapman]

You're not investigating anything. Instead you are just making wild claims you can (or will) not back up with evidence.

Name a few wild claims

[Martin Weidmann]

I see evidence that you also consider this discussion platform as your personal court-of-law

Translation; "I was expecting that you take my word for whatever it is I say, so why are you harassing me about all this evidence stuff?"

[Martin Weidmann]

Name a few wild claims

And waste my time? No way. I'm not playing your little game.

Your posting history is full of wild claims..... but here's one;

Now, where's the evidence that the MC rifle was (1) ever in Ruth Paine's garage and (2) in the bag the Oswald carried?
>>> The MC that was in the garage and in the bag Oswald carried.

and don't give that "That was a dig" crap....

Btw, just so you understand, this time the quotation marks were used to actually quote you.

[John Iacoletti]

In other words, stop investigating the ways that the bag can be manipulated to challenge what Buell concludes was under the armpit solely because he saw nothing above the shoulders.

You're mistaking "speculation" for "investigation".

[John Iacoletti]

I see evidence that you also consider this discussion platform as your personal court-of-law

Informed people discuss the case and the evidence.  Ignorant people get the details wrong, play word games, post movie clips, and try to act clever while never saying anything relevant.

[John Iacoletti]

Name a few wild claims

Here's another one:

Oswald shot Tippit and probably shot Kennedy.

[John Iacoletti]

Yet another one:

Several people from both murder scenes can confirm the truth of the matter for you.