Did Ruby really kill Oswald?

[Jerry Freeman]

Has anyone else ever found a picture of Ruby wearing glasses? Or a report of some sort that he wore glasses or needed them for vision.
Most people who are near sighted have to wear corrective lenses all the time [for driving and stuff]
Probably far too late to obtain vision exams records huh?

[Charles Collins]

Hello, I am new here. After researching the video footage of Oswald getting shot, as well as  photos of Jack Ruby, his own words, etc... as well as the work of other independent researchers on this topic, I am convinced there is more to Oswald's killing than meets the eye. The short man in the fedora who killed Oswald, how can we be sure it was really Jack Ruby? We never see his face. The Oswald shooter is shorter, has stocky legs wider and has a wider face than Ruby did. He was also wearing a different colored suit jacket than Ruby was in the Dallas County jail corridor, minutes before, and he had no fedora on and an entirely different build, hairline, messy hair cut, and ear shape. Plus no one ever photographs or films the Oswald shooters face EVER. When he is wrestled to the ground after he shoots Oswald, everyone seems to carefully cover him so NO ONE sees him. There is zero photographic or film evidence of this man's face. Then only afterwards do you see Ruby walking without his suit jacket on, supposedly right after he was arrested and apprehended. It just doesnt match up. Why doesn't he still have his suit jacket ojn? Maybe because they knew it is much lighter than the Oswald shooter's jacket? That is just one inconsistency in all this. Plus, listening to Ruby interviewed convinces me he was set up as a patsy, just like Oswald was. RAlph Stinky did some interesting work on this subject: I agree with a lot of his thesis. What do you guys think? Isn't it strange we NEVER see the Oswald's shooter's face from the time he appears to the time he is wrestled to the ground and apprehended?

We never see his face.


I just happened to read this today and it reminded me of this thread. I have a vague memory of seeing a film in which Ruby looks back to where the camera catches one side of his face. Does anyone know which film it is and possibly have a frame capture of it?


Mr. HUBERT. Did you hear anybody running down the ramp just before the shooting, running down or possibly walking down?
Mr. PHENIX. No, I think if he had been running I would have heard him because the sound just echoes in that basement.
I saw some film, and I'm sure you've seen it too, some of the film that showed Ruby positioned down there, and he looks back where you catch almost a full shot of his face before Oswald comes down, and that anyway--it just looks like he was there for a while

[Mark A. Oblazney]

In his defense there are a lot of conspiracy people here who believe things that are simply not possible; so, he's not alone. Was the Oliver Stone movie or the Garrison thesis any more unbelievable, any more illogical? Millions of people saw Stone's movie - it was widely praised; thousands of people hear Garrison's claims - he is still heralded for his work by some.

We have people who come here day-after-day for years saying "There's no evidence Oswald shot Tippit" or "There's no evidence Oswald owned the rifle." That's almost as illogical as the claim that Ruby didn't shoot Oswald.

True

[John Corbett]

True

This thread illustrates just how nutty CTs can be. Millions of people saw Ruby kill Oswald and that still isn't enough to convince some people of his guilt.

Had there been a hi-def security camera on the 6th floor of the TSBD and it showed Oswald taking aim and firing three shots out the window, some people would find some excuse to dismiss the footage. No amount of proof that Oswald was the assassin could ever be enough for a dedicated CT.

[Royell Storing]

This thread illustrates just how nutty CTs can be. Millions of people saw Ruby kill Oswald and that still isn't enough to convince some people of his guilt.

Had there been a hi-def security camera on the 6th floor of the TSBD and it showed Oswald taking aim and firing three shots out the window, some people would find some excuse to dismiss the footage. No amount of proof that Oswald was the assassin could ever be enough for a dedicated CT.

    To this day, we still have the Fake News Media, (MSNBC/MSNOW), claiming the Trump assassination attempt was staged. And that Trump did not suffer any kind of gunshot injury. The rejection of Stone Cold Fact(s) is not restricted to CT's, the JFK Assassination, or the psychedelic 60's in general.

[John Corbett]

    To this day, we still have the Fake News Media, (MSNBC/MSNOW), claiming the Trump assassination attempt was staged. And that Trump did not suffer any kind of gunshot injury. The rejection of Stone Cold Fact(s) is not restricted to CT's, the JFK Assassination, or the psychedelic 60's in general.

So are you saying JFK CT nuttiness is on par with MSNOW nuttiness?