Touring the Tippit Scene

[Martin Weidmann]

I have explained to you that this is not what other readers (who want to learn about the assassination) are looking for.

Readers who want to learn about the assassination ( coup d e'tat ) do not want to see the Warren Report regurgitated.....Which is all you're doing Charles.    Readers are looking for answers... Because they know that the Warren Report is a damned lie.

Absolutely right, Walt.

Why would anybody join a forum, which is after all a place of discussion, just to blindly repeat and defend the Warren Report while being unwilling to enter into a discussion?

What are LNs so afraid of that they do not want to enter into a debate?

[Charles Collins]

Absolutely right, Walt.

Why would anybody join a forum, which is after all a place of discussion, just to blindly repeat and defend the Warren Report while being unwilling to enter into a discussion?

What are LNs so afraid of that they do not want to enter into a debate?

Maybe Duncan will create a section for all but LNs for y’all. I promise to stay out if he does.

[Martin Weidmann]

Maybe Duncan will create a section for all but LNs for y’all. I promise to stay out if he does.

He doesn't have to and you don't need to promise.

You're already staying out of every discussion that has any substance or significance.

Here's a suggestion for you; Just post the Warren Report and you'll be done. It will save you a lot of time!

[John Iacoletti]

You two would argue with a stop sign, there is absolutely no doubt about it. I was being kind when I said it was unlikely that you wouldn’t have argued.

You forgot to add the word “likely” to your latest conjecture.

[John Iacoletti]

Your “I don’t like that word” tirades only detract from the discussions and waste time and effort.

Wow. Pot-kettle.

[John Iacoletti]

So you would prefer a forum for only people who believe that the WC got everything totally wrong?

The key word there is regurgitated (well, regurgitated with the word “likely” generously sprinkled in). If you or anyone else could defend the WC conclusions with actual conclusive evidence that would be quite another matter.

[Charles Collins]

The key word there is regurgitated (well, regurgitated with the word “likely” generously sprinkled in). If you or anyone else could defend the WC conclusions with actual conclusive evidence that would be quite another matter.

It certainly wouldn’t hurt my feelings if a separate section was created. Then y’all could make up your own conclusions and support them with all the evidence that doesn’t exist.