Bledsoe indicated that the shirt Oswald was wearing on the bus just after the assassination had the hole in it and the bus transfer was found in the pocket of that shirt. So the arrest shirt is most likely the same one that he had on that morning. Regardless, if the fibers come from Oswald's shirt - even if you don't think it was he one he wore that morning - it still links him to the rifle. In that scenario, they just got on his rifle at some earlier time. The importance is that - like all evidence in this case - it points to Oswald. But the shirt fibers are just a cherry on top of Oswald's sundae of guilt. He left his rifle at the murder scene. He lied about owing the rifle and offered no explanation for it to have been found in the TSBD. He fled the scene. Murdered a cop within an hour. That cooks his goose a thousand times over without the fibers. All the other evidence against him just confirms the obvious.
Bledsoe indicated that the shirt Oswald was wearing on the bus just after the assassination had the hole in it and the bus transfer was found in the pocket of that shirt. So the arrest shirt is most likely the same one that he had on that morning.Trust you to jump to the wrong conclusion based on speculation rather than an examination of the evidence.
Photo's of Oswald's arrest shirt, taken on Friday, prior to the shirt being sent to the FBI, do not show a hole. Bledsoe did not indicate that the shirt Oswald was wearing on the bus was the arrest shirt. She recognized the shirt from when the FBI brought it to her house and showed it to her, prior to her testimony. As for the bus transfer, that wasn't (allegedly) found in the pocket of Oswald's arrest shirt until hours after the arrest, just like the extra bullets were. The problem with that is that Oswald was already searched when he was arrested. It's standard operating procedure! So why were those items not found at that time?
Regardless, if the fibers come from Oswald's shirt - even if you don't think it was he one he wore that morning - it still links him to the rifle. So what? The Klein's transaction and the BY photos also linked him to the rifle. That doesn't mean he fired it, if the rifle was fired at all on 11/22/63.
In that scenario, they just got on his rifle at some earlier time. The importance is that - like all evidence in this case - it points to Oswald. But the shirt fibers are just a cherry on top of Oswald's sundae of guilt. He left his rifle at the murder scene. Wrong again. A rifle that can be linked to Oswald (in some highly dubious ways) was left at the TSBD. You have no evidence whatsoever, except of course your usual assumptions and speculations, that Oswald brought it into the building or that it was him who left it there. Appearances can be, and often are, deceiving. Yet you keep falling for them all the time.
He lied about owing the rifle and offered no explanation for it to have been found in the TSBDAssumes "facts" not in evidence. All the reports of the interrogators show is that, at best, he was only asked if he owned a rifle. He wasn't shown the MC rifle, nor the revolver, and they never asked him if he left a rifle at the TSBD, and thus never gave him an opportunity to explain how the MC rifle could have ended up at the TSBD
He fled the scene. A mere assumption and thus a misrepresentation of the available evidence. If you flee a scene of a crime, you do not offer your taxi to an old lady, nor do you go walking in a residential area.
Murdered a cop within an hour. Another highly questionable assumption. I am well aware that you never let evidence get in the way of your opinions, but you really need to stop jumping to conclusions that are not supported by the evidence.
That cooks his goose a thousand times over without the fibers. All the other evidence against him just confirms the obvious.
Nope, all your rhetoric shows is that you are obviously biased beyond help, unable to look at the evidence honestly and unwilling to even consider or discuss anything that does not match your predetermined opinion.
