Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: On The Trail Of Delusion  (Read 186149 times)

Online W. Tracy Parnell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 396
    • W. Tracy Parnell Debunking JFK Conspiracy Theories
Great job. Using the nutty Dr. Miller does not reflect well on Stone and DiEugenio.  ???

Online Mitch Todd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1147
Re: Two Important Posts DEbunk "JFK Revisited"
« Reply #827 on: January 24, 2022, 01:15:18 PM »
I'm not spamming the forum by attempting to promote myself.
If you link to a page containing research or thoughtful commentary, why does it matter if you wrote it or someone else did?

I couldn't care less if you guys read what I've written here or anywhere else.
If you really believed that, you wouldn't be posting here. And you wouldn't be replying to me.
« Last Edit: January 24, 2022, 01:19:04 PM by Mitch Todd »

Online Fred Litwin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
Mark Lane vs. Sylvia Meagher
« Reply #828 on: January 24, 2022, 02:22:08 PM »
Mark Lane vs. Sylvia Meagher
Mark Lane wrote a blurb for Meagher's book, Accessories After the Fact, but was not happy about her few paragraphs about Jim Garrison. I present two never before published letters.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/mark-lane-vs-sylvia-meagher

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
Re: Two Important Posts DEbunk "JFK Revisited"
« Reply #829 on: January 24, 2022, 04:31:05 PM »
If you link to a page containing research or thoughtful commentary, why does it matter if you wrote it or someone else did?
If you really believed that, you wouldn't be posting here. And you wouldn't be replying to me.

There’s a huge difference between posting links for the purpose of discussion versus posting links to get clicks for your own blog or to promote your own books…

Online Fred Litwin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
Re: JFK Revisited
« Reply #830 on: January 24, 2022, 05:03:58 PM »
Having it both ways:

- Fred only wrote his book for money.

- No one will buy your book.

My blog posts are pretty substantive. They usually don't even mention my own book. I have published
hundreds and hundreds of primary Garrison documents are not not available elsewhere.

fred

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
Re: Two Important Posts DEbunk "JFK Revisited"
« Reply #831 on: January 24, 2022, 10:37:05 PM »
I'm pretty sure Fred is not into JFK research for book sales. And I doubt if traffic on his blog has led to more than a handful of book sales.

Contrast with the CT promotion of "JFK Revisited" as if it's a must-see factual documentary, rather than Riefenstahlesque brainwashing.

The world according to Jerry:

All LN's have honest intentions.

All CT'ers are evil.

 ::)

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
Re: Two Important Posts DEbunk "JFK Revisited"
« Reply #832 on: January 24, 2022, 11:18:32 PM »
"All"?

I thought you saw the world in shades of gray, not absolutes.

I'm not talking about myself Jerry.

But in my opinion there are honest and dishonest people on both sides of the debates...