Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: On The Trail Of Delusion  (Read 186149 times)

Online Fred Litwin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
Re: Oliver Stone Pulls the Wool over Joe Rogan's Eyes...
« Reply #798 on: January 15, 2022, 03:37:30 PM »
You mean what YOU think is dependent on me?

fred

Offline Mike Orr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 408
Re: JFK Revisited
« Reply #799 on: January 15, 2022, 03:45:04 PM »
Oliver Stone made it possible for this forum to get to where it is today . For those who can't grasp what happened that day in Dallas with the murder of JFK then they won't ever believe what happened , no matter what ! That's ok because there is no doubt that there was a conspiracy to remove JFK !

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oliver Stone Pulls the Wool over Joe Rogan's Eyes...
« Reply #800 on: January 15, 2022, 08:30:01 PM »
No, what I mean is that what you think is dependent on whether allegations without evidence support your narrative or not.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: JFK Revisited
« Reply #801 on: January 15, 2022, 08:31:55 PM »
Right here:

Mr. PURDY - When did you first become aware of the existence of photographs of the autopsy of President Kennedy?
Mr. KNUDSEN - The morning following the autopsy, Dr. Berkley -- to the best of my knowledge, Dr. Berkley had the film holders in a brown paper bag and handed them to me. Jim Fox, the Secret Service expert, was told to go over and develop them and see that they were secure at all times.

Mr. PURDY - Did you ever have knowledge of, or were you ever told about, autopsy x-rays, for example?
Mr. KNUDSEN - No. I do not know that any were ever taken.

If Knudsen did know about the photos until the next morning, then he didn't take them. Not knowing if x-rays were taken is another, if a bit more subtle, giveaway.

So, Knudsen didn't actually "tell the HSCA that he did not take photographs".

Online Fred Litwin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
Garrison Claimed the CIA was also behind the RFK and MLK Assassinations
« Reply #802 on: January 16, 2022, 06:39:42 PM »
Garrison Claimed the CIA was also Behind the RFK and MLK Assassinations
In an interview with Thomas Buchanan that would ultimately be printed in the National Enquirer, Jim Garrison claimed that the CIA was also behind the RFK and the MLK assassinations.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/garrison-claimed-the-cia-was-also-behind-the-rfk-and-mlk-assassinations

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
Re: Garrison Claimed the CIA was also behind the RFK and MLK Assassinations
« Reply #803 on: January 16, 2022, 08:18:28 PM »
There’s circumstantial evidence pointing to CIA involvement in RFK’s assassination.

Coincidentally, the LAPD detectives who controlled the investigation were CIA contractors.

Coincidentally, James Angelton had RFK’s autopsy photos in his personal files. Why Angleton was interested in the RFK assassination? No one knows.

Additionally, Sirhan Sirhan is easily hypnotized and while some have suggested that he experimented with hypnosis and maybe hypnotized himself, the CIA’s MKULTRA projects included experiments with hypnosis. So it’s possible that he was an unwitting participant in an MKULTRA-related project.

I don’t know enough about the role of the CIA in MLK’s murder but I’ve seen lots of stuff that points to an FBI role.

Obviously, Jim Garrison couldn’t have known of the things I mentioned back in 1969 but his intuition was probably close to the truth…
« Last Edit: January 16, 2022, 08:53:34 PM by Jon Banks »

Online Mitch Todd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1147
Re: JFK Revisited
« Reply #804 on: January 17, 2022, 11:12:17 AM »
So, Knudsen didn't actually "tell the HSCA that he did not take photographs".
Again, his replies to the two questions that I quoted preclude him from having taken photos of the autopsy. Thus, he said he didn't. You are trying to insist that it doesn't count unless Knudsen said it in a way that you consider acceptable, but that requirement is simply your own invention.