On The Trail Of Delusion

[Rick Plant]

Where did he state Oswald "never had a sense of humor"?
I must have missed this.

Are you serious? So, you come into this thread and start attacking me when you have no clue what's going on. Quit trying to start an argument when your are oblivious to the matter. 

 

[Dan O'meara]

Are you serious? So, you come into this thread and start attacking me when you have no clue what's going on. Quit trying to start an argument when your are oblivious to the matter.

What Reply did Richard state that Oswald "never had a sense of humor"?
Where did he post this?
It's not a difficult question to answer.

[Dan O'meara]

Are you serious? So, you come into this thread and start attacking me when you have no clue what's going on. Quit trying to start an argument when your are oblivious to the matter.

You've obviously not read through my post highlighting your deceitfulness in this matter.
Richard never posted that Oswald "never had a sense of humor".
This is a lie that you have created and continue to perpetuate.
I'm no fan of Richard's but I find your underhand dealings can't go unchecked.

In Reply #116 Richard made this statement - "Oswald had no apparent sense of humor."
In Reply #129 you asked - "How do you know Oswald had no "apparent sense of humor"? Did you know the man personally to know that?"
By Reply #133 you are accusing Richard of making an "absolute statement" about Oswald, but the fact is by using the word "apparent" Richard is not making an absolute statement.
You then do something very deceptive.
In Reply #156 you ask - "Have you hung out with Lee Harvey Oswald to know that he didn't have a sense of humor?"
But Richard never said Oswald didn't have a sense of humour, that is an absolute statement. He said Oswald had no apparent sense of humour, which is not an absolute statement as it means Oswald's sense of humour is not apparent to Richard. It's an opinion. Not an absolute statement as you keep insisting.
You then do something truly deceptive. You actually change what Richard said. In Reply #168 you post - "That's why Richard Smith's claim that Oswald was "never humorous" is absolutely ridiculous..."
By putting "never humorous" in quotation marks you are implying this is what Richard actually said but it is something you have completely made up.
Then you go even further. In Reply #189 you make this outrageous claim - "You made an absolute statement about Lee Harvey Oswald regarding his personality stating "he never had a sense of humor" but you never met the man to know if he never had a sense of humor as you claimed."
So you have twisted "Oswald had no apparent sense of humor" into Oswald was "never humorous" and then into "he never had a sense of humor".

The question still stands - how can you justify this  ?

[Rick Plant]

What Reply did Richard state that Oswald "never had a sense of humor"?
Where did he post this?
It's not a difficult question to answer.

You've obviously not read through my post highlighting your deceitfulness in this matter.
Richard never posted that Oswald "never had a sense of humor".
This is a lie that you have created and continue to perpetuate.
I'm no fan of Richard's but I find your underhand dealings can't go unchecked.

The question still stands - how can you justify this  ?

I wouldn't be asking Richard this question several times and he wouldn't be refusing to answer it if he never said it.

Before you embarrass yourself even more and make more false accusations against me I suggest you read this entire thread.     

[Dan O'meara]

I wouldn't be asking Richard this question several times and he wouldn't be refusing to answer it if he never said it.

Doddering old man logic.
He never said Oswald "never had a sense of humor". You made this up. You don't understand this do you? You don't really understand what's going on, do you?

Before you embarrass yourself even more and make more false accusations against me I suggest you read this entire thread.   

If you understood my post you would understand I have read through this thread - a number of times.
The BYPs are an important issue that must be integrated into an overall narrative. I have kept an eye on this thread getting increasingly annoyed over your (and your lapdog's) apparent attempts to derail it.
I am embarrassed because I thought there was a devious and cunning intelligence at work here but it turns out you're just a baffled old man who doesn't know what's going on.

Apologies for disturbing your nap, sir.

[Rick Plant]

Doddering old man logic.
He never said Oswald "never had a sense of humor". You made this up. You don't understand this do you? You don't really understand what's going on, do you?

If you understood my post you would understand I have read through this thread - a number of times.
The BYPs are an important issue that must be integrated into an overall narrative. I have kept an eye on this thread getting increasingly annoyed over your (and your lapdog's) apparent attempts to derail it.
I am embarrassed because I thought there was a devious and cunning intelligence at work here but it turns out you're just a baffled old man who doesn't know what's going on.

Apologies for disturbing your nap, sir.

Wow...such anger and hostility in your post. You are out of line with your comments.

I've made nothing up and you're falsely attacking me for no reason. Go read the thread.   

I never derailed anything. Richard Smith made an absolute statement about Oswald and his personality. I simply asked him a question and he refused to answer it. All I get back is long winded replies and insults.

The only person derailing the thread is you by attacking me  Martin called you out on that as well.   

[Fred Litwin]

Two Reasons why Clay Shaw Never Admitted to being a Domestic Contact of the CIA
Today I have posted a rather important CIA document which is self-explanatory. Also some excellent writing by Clay Shaw about the CIA and Jim Garrison's case.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/two-reasons-why-clay-shaw-never-admitted-to-being-a-domestic-contact-of-the-cia