On The Trail Of Delusion

[Martin Weidmann]

Buried in the mountain of LN nonsense produced in this thread, there was a serious question asked to see if those LNs, in particular "Richard Smith", were able/willing to actually discuss and/or explain an evidence conundrum

Personally I think the photos are probably real, but the backstory is most likely bogus. How else can it be that a BY photo was found in George DeMohrenschildt's storage room, which not only was of far better quality than the others  but also had writing on the back from a person who was never identified?

In a scenario where Oswald had the photos taken by his wife and developed them himself at his place of work, why would the quality of the photos not be the same for all the photos and why in the world would he give a copy to George DeMohrenschildt, if the latter had nothing to do with any of it? Do you know of many would be assassins who, after allegedly committing attempted murder, gives an incriminating photo of himself holding the murder weapon to a man he hardly knew?

[Bill Chapman]

There is no point whatsoever to even try to have any kind of normal conversation with the vinegar drinking nutjob, formerly known as "artist".

I can see why you want to have just a 'normal' conversation
A man's got to know his limitations, and you've nailed that.

[Martin Weidmann]

I can see why you want to have just a 'normal' conversation
A man's got to know his limitations, and you've nailed that.

It took you a whole day to come up with that one?   

Too bad you don't know what a normal conversation is. Your posts on this thread provide conclusive evidence of your ignorance.

[Jon Banks]

Buried in the mountain of LN nonsense produced in this thread, there was a serious question asked to see if those LNs, in particular "Richard Smith", were able/willing to actually discuss and/or explain an evidence conundrum

Those are legit questions. I did read somewhere that the “Hunter of Fascists” caption wasn’t in Oswald’s handwriting.
 
Most of those sorts of questions can’t be answered so they hide behind the “Oswald was a deranged madman” explanation.

[Bill Chapman]

It took you a whole day to come up with that one?   

Too bad you don't know what a normal conversation is. Your posts on this thread provide conclusive evidence of your ignorance.

Unlike you lot, i don't need instant gratification.
A normal conversation in your case is to try to insult every LNer from the get-go
You lot are the ones saddled with ignorance: Six decades and nothing but landfill from you brainiacs.
My posts retell — with brilliant artistry and no little sarcasm— actual witness testimony, not CT misinterpretation of same.


billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next

Garbage in, garbage out

[Martin Weidmann]

Unlike you lot, i don't need instant gratification.
A normal conversation in your case is to try to insult every LNer from the get-go
You lot are the ones saddled with ignorance: Six decades and nothing but landfill from you brainiacs.
My posts retell — with brilliant artistry and no little sarcasm— actual witness testimony, not CT misinterpretation of same.

Garbage in, garbage out

Garbage in, garbage out

Wow. I did not expect so much self awareness from you   

[Paul May]

Just for clarification, not everyone, including myself, agrees with Stone that the entire Military Industrial Complex killed JFK due to his resistance towards escalation of US involvement in Vietnam. Stone is entitled to his own opinion but there's room for other points of view.

Beyond that, both sides are to blame for the start of the Cold War but the US is (arguably) more responsible for it lasting several decades. I'm sure there's more than one interpretation of Cold War history but the TV series you're referring to was written by Historian, Peter Kuznick. Almost all historical events have more than one interpretation and the consensus of historians can change over time. For example, President Ulysses Grant is experiencing a revival in popularity among contemporary historians after spending a century being called one of the worst US Presidents. So it seems perfectly fine and normal to read or watch Kuznick's alternative interpretations of 20th century world history.

Lastly, Stone's opinions on the MIC and US covert ops are based in reality.

It's fair to criticize how much Stone blames Defense and Financial institutions for the evils of the world but the criticisms aren't baseless. After all, it was none other than President Dwight Eisenhower who first warned about the dangers of the Military Industrial Complex and President Harry Truman after the JFK assassination who called for the CIA to be reined in.

Have you read any of the books on the Dulles brothers? They were the epitome of the "Deep State".

In reality, Eisenhower was warning American’s about the MIC’s new chief, JFK. It was JFK who campaigned on the phony missile gap with the soviets and was telling American’s to build bomb shelters. In his short tenure as POTUS, the MIC became the largest in America’s history. JFK was a staunch anti communist pillorying Harry Truman while a Senator for losing China to the communists. It would not happen on his watch he told aides.