On The Trail Of Delusion

[Jon Banks]

So your bad in plan/no plan
Sounds constructive on my part

Maybe you should take a hike

My comment that you responded to was in response to Richard’s suggestion that Oswald had the foresight to know that people would still be debating the Kennedy assassination almost 60 years later.

Take your concerns about my response up with him…

[Martin Weidmann]

My comment that you responded to was in response to Richard’s suggestion that Oswald had the foresight to know that people would still be debating the Kennedy assassination almost 60 years later.

Take your concerns about my response up with him…

There is no point whatsoever to even try to have any kind of normal conversation with the vinegar drinking nutjob, formerly known as "artist".

[Bill Chapman]

The stance of a coward

Yes it most certainly is. You can't even answer the question.

Now keep pretending that you are an "artist"

Yes it most certainly is. You can't even answer the question.
_I just did, JAQer

Now keep pretending that you are an "artist"
_No pretence needed, Slick

[Bill Chapman]

My comment that you responded to was in response to Richard’s suggestion that Oswald had the foresight to know that people would still be debating the Kennedy assassination almost 60 years later.

Take your concerns about my response up with him…

Sheesh...again with the deflection, already.
What has Richard got to do with my ignored plan/no plan conclusion?
Seems I've caught you with your hand in the cookie jar again today

[Martin Weidmann]

Yes it most certainly is. You can't even answer the question.
_I just did, JAQer

Now keep pretending that you are an "artist"
_No pretence needed, Slick

_No pretence needed, Slick

In Hollywood there are thousands of waitresses, bell boys etc who say the same thing and call themselves actor or actrice.

[Bill Chapman]

_No pretence needed, Slick

In Hollywood there are thousands of waitresses, bell boys etc who say the same thing and call themselves actor or actrice.

Are you implying something?
And leave those struggling actors alone, punk

[Bill Chapman]

My career proclaimed itself
Unlike you, I'm not looking to get replies
Not my bad that you chuckleheads can't
put names to your claims.

What, too soon?

[Bill Brown]

The HSCA Photographic Panel studied CE-133A, CE-133B, the negative of CE-133B and Oswald's camera (among many other items related to the photos, such as first generation prints of CE-133C).

The panel first performed a visual inspection of the photos, by use magnifiers and microscopes.  During this inspection, the panel made enlargements of the photos using various exposures and ranges of contrast.  These enlargements produced prints which ranged from very light to very dark.  In the darkest parts of the photos, the detail could be seen best in the lighter prints.  In the lightest parts of the photos, the detail could be seen best in the darker prints.  The panel felt this was the best opportunity of detecting any evidence of falsification anywhere in the pictures.

The panel also used digital image processing to determine if there were any unnatural edge lines or differences in grain structure or contrast.

Both photos (CE-133a and CE-133B) were also studied by the panel using stereoscopic techniques, which allowed the panel to see the photos in 3-D.  This method will detect forgeries in prints because it produces a photographic copy of a photograph.
 When viewed in stereo, these copies will not project a three-dimensional image unless made from different viewpoints along the same axis.  Retouching of the original photo can be detected when two photos depicting the same scene are viewed in stereo, the retouched print will not be on the same plane in which it should be lying; the items seen in the photo will be either in front of the plane or behind the plane.  Because of this, when viewed stereoscopically, fakery can easily be detected.

One final method the panel used to examine the photos was photogrammetrically.

Using all of these methods, the HSCA Photographic Panel detected no signs of forgery.