On The Trail Of Delusion

[Jerry Freeman]

The "95%" claim was made by Wiess and Ashkenazy, no one else. Two guys.

The study was supervised by Dr. James E. Barger, the firm's chief scientist. At the time of the reconstruction in August 1978, the committee was extremely conscious of the significance of Barger's preliminary work, realizing, as it did, that his analysis indicated that there possibly were too many shots, spaced too closely together, 5 for Lee Harvey Oswald to have fired all of them, and that one of the shots came from" the grassy knoll, not the Texas School Book Depository. When questioned about the probability of the entire third impulse pattern representing a supersonic bullet being fired at the President from the grassy knoll, Barger estimated there was a 20 percent chance that the N-wave, as opposed to the sequence of impulses following it, was actually caused by random noise.(65) Accordingly, the mathematical probability of the entire sequence of impulses actually representing a supersonic bullet was 76 percent, the product of a 95 percent chance that the impulse pattern represented noise as loud as a rifle shot from the grassy knoll times an 80 percent chance that the N-wave was caused by a supersonic bullet. (66)

The committee found no evidence or indication of any other cause of noise as loud as a rifle shot coming from the grassy knoll at the time the impulse sequence was recorded on the dispatch tape, and therefore concluded that the cause was probably a gunshot fired at the motorcade.

https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/select-committee-report/part-1b.html

The Backyard pictures do not prove that Oswald killed JFK.
In retrospect...being plastered on the cover of LIFE magazine with the caption 'weapons used to kill Kennedy and Officer Tippit' instilled prejudice in the minds of Americans no matter the questions and no matter the circumstantial evidence.

[Dan O'meara]

It was Oswald


billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next

"It was Oswald"

You said it so it must be true.

[Patrick Jackson]

You have to understand and accept that every single official and unofficial statement from Marina Oswald must be taken with reserve. She was giving statements in Russian which was then translated in English. We can not accept any her statement from 1963/64 for granted and 100% accurate.
If Oswald was framed as LN, than why would we believe that Marina statements translations are accurate?

Maybe it was like this:
Question: Did you take back yard photos?
Marina in Russian: Yes, but not this ones!
Translator: Yes, but not this ones.
Translation in statement: Yes.

[Bill Chapman]

"It was Oswald"

You said it so it must be true.

So Oswald didn't say that his head was pasted on someone else's body. Got it.
I saw/said.. you saw/fled.

[Bill Chapman]

Fake genius.

Fake artist.

Fake quotes.

Next?

Fake genius.
_Just ordinary, until now
  You lot retain 'Almost'

Fake artist.
_Graphic design is one of the arts

Fake quotes.
_Artistic license

Next?
_You are, troll

[Bill Chapman]

« Last Edit: Today at 01:42:22 PM by Bill Chapman »

Edit?

ROFL

Edit?
_Sure, but I charge $250/per hour

ROFL
_Still throwing up, I see
  Best see a vet

[Richard Smith]

https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/select-committee-report/part-1b.html

The Backyard pictures do not prove that Oswald killed JFK.
In retrospect...being plastered on the cover of LIFE magazine with the caption 'weapons used to kill Kennedy and Officer Tippit' instilled prejudice in the minds of Americans no matter the questions and no matter the circumstantial evidence.

Posing with the murder weapons while looking like some type of political loon has that impact.  Another example of arguing that the evidence against Oswald is so overwhelming that it can only mean he is innocent.  LOL.