On The Trail Of Delusion

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: On The Trail Of Delusion  (Read 155579 times)

Online Mitch Todd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1105
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #469 on: November 24, 2021, 01:00:24 AM »
Not at all. However...regarding expert forensic evidence, a panel of sound engineers, acoustical specialists and various other auditory authorities told the HSCA committee that there is a 95% chance that there was a 4th shot from the knoll area.
A whole lot more than 95% of the only one guy believers completely reject those experts.
I am skeptical.
The "95%" claim was made by Wiess and Ashkenazy, no one else. Two guys.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Oliver Stone with "JFK Revisited" Crucifies Clay Shaw Once Again
« Reply #470 on: November 24, 2021, 07:24:46 AM »

Less than a minute was spent on Clay Shaw so your thread title is a little ridiculous.
Actually...crucified?... is way over the top.
Quote
Oliver Stone Crucifies Clay Shaw Once Again
Clay Shaw was not martyred...He smoked himself to death---
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clay_Shaw#Death 

Offline Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3774
Re: JFK Revisited Lays an Egg
« Reply #471 on: November 24, 2021, 07:45:39 AM »
Tell us us how posting sworn testimony is goofy

Sworn testimony?


   billchapman_hunter of trolls



Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: JFK Revisited Lays an Egg
« Reply #472 on: November 24, 2021, 11:14:28 AM »
Sworn testimony?


   billchapman_hunter of trolls

It was Oswald


billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next

« Last Edit: November 24, 2021, 11:18:07 AM by Bill Chapman »

Online Fred Litwin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 588
JFK Revisited Distorts John Stringer's Testimony
« Reply #473 on: November 24, 2021, 02:14:08 PM »
JFK Revisited Distorts John Stringer's Testimony
Oliver Stone's so-called documentary makes it seem that autopsy photographer John Stringer disputed the authenticity of the photographs of JFK's brain. Nothing could be further from the truth. Stone and DiEugenio distort his testimony to make him say something he didn't.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/jfk-revisited-distorts-john-stringer-s-testimony

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
Re: JFK Revisited Distorts John Stringer's Testimony
« Reply #474 on: November 24, 2021, 04:20:06 PM »
Stringer has given inconsistent statements on Kennedy’s wounds and the autopsy photos but in his example I believe it’s due to memory lapses, not malice.

Quote
8/26/72: Occiput had large defect

Lifton: [W]as the main damage to the skull on the top, or in the back?

Stringer: In the back.

Lifton: ...High In the back, or lower In the back?

Stringer: Oh, the occipital part in the back there  (garbled) up above the neck.

Lifton: …In other words, the main part of his head that was blasted away was in the occipital part of the skull?

Stringer: Yes. the back part. [Tape played for Stringer in 1996, p78]


https://www.history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/TracesOfWitnessTampering/TracesOfWitnessTampering.htm

Stringer wasn’t alone. Several witnesses between Parkland hospital and the autopsy recalled seeing a large wound in the right-rear of Kennedy’s skull (which the autopsy photos don’t show).

It would be easy to dismiss as just an inaccurate recollection if there weren’t so many witnesses who described the head wound that way.

Online W. Tracy Parnell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 396
    • W. Tracy Parnell Debunking JFK Conspiracy Theories
Re: JFK Revisited Distorts John Stringer's Testimony
« Reply #475 on: November 24, 2021, 05:11:21 PM »
Excellent job Fred. Look forward to the report on Knudson.