On The Trail Of Delusion

[Jerry Freeman]

The mystery lump is actually quite a common phenomenon usually referred to as... a wrist bone.   

You flunk anatomy there...that is not a wrist bone.

[Rick Plant]

What about that knot on Oswald's right wrist that was there and then miraculously went away...and then was mystifyingly transported to Roscoe White's right wrist in the same identical place?
Pretty weird huh?



Question always was..Why does the photograph look fake? Answer again is experts [supported by the see no evil media]---
Experts [only identified as "the experts"]...concluded that never mind all this doubt folks...all is well in la-la land.

Don't you think every minute detail was combed over in the photographs to look for anomalies?

It's difficult to make the case the photos are forged or fake when each one went through forensic photo analysis and were concluded to be authentic by renowned forensic photo analysts.   

[Jerry Freeman]

Don't you think every minute detail was combed over in the photographs to look for anomalies?

It's difficult to make the case the photos are forged or fake when each one went through forensic photo analysis and were concluded to be authentic by renowned forensic photo analysts.

If they're so 'renowned' why can't you name them?
That shadow on the left cheek?...Some kind of freak eclipse I suppose?

[Fred Litwin]

Oliver Stone with "JFK Revisited" Crucifies Clay Shaw Once Again
Today is the 58 anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. We should all take some time today to remember his life and the optimism he engendered in Americans. Unfortunately, Oliver Stone's so-called documentary, JFK Revisited, will be showing today and, once again, he crucifies Clay Shaw, an innocent gay man whose life was ruined by Jim Garrison. Shame on you, Oliver Stone.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/oliver-stone-with-jfk-revisited-crucifies-clay-shaw-once-again

[Ted Shields]

Its disgraceful documentary in parts. For him to double down on thoroughly debunked theories so far after the event. Crazy.

Couldn't believe how bad it was.

[Mark A. Oblazney]

JFK Revisited Doesn't Tell the Whole Truth about John Connally
Oliver Stone's so-called documentary includes a video clip of John Connally seemingly disputing the single bullet theory. Oliver Stone doesn't tell you the whole truth about John Connally.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/jfk-revisited-doesn-t-tell-the-whole-truth-about-john-connally

can't log in

[Bill Chapman]

If they're so 'renowned' why can't you name them?
That shadow on the left cheek?...Some kind of freak eclipse I suppose?

'why can't you name them?'

[3] C. McGlone, E. Mikhail, J. Bethel, R. Mullen, Manual of Photogram- metry, 5th Edition, American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2004.
[4] R. Hartley, A. Zisserman, Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[5] V. Blanz, T. Vetter, A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces, in: SIGGRAPH, Computer Graphics Proceedings, Los Angeles, 1999, pp. 187–194.
[6] P. Guan, A. Weiss, A. Balan, M. Black, Estimating human shape and pose from a single image, in: International Conference on Computer Vision, Kyoto, Japan, 2009.
[7] Y. Ostrovsky, P. Cavanagh, P. Sinha, Perceiving illumination inconsis- tencies in scenes, Perception 34 (2005) 1301–1314.
[8] H. Farid, M. Bravo, Image forensic analyses that elude the human visual system, in: SPIE Symposium on Electronic Imaging, San Jose, CA, 2010.
[9] H. Farid, The Lee Harvey Oswald backyard photos: Real or fake?, Per- ception 11 (38) (2009) 1731–1734.

'shadow on the left cheek'
_It's shading, not a shadow*

3.3. Posture
It has been argued that Oswald is leaning so far to the left as to be physically implausible. Our 3-D model allows for arbitrary views of Oswald’s body and measurements of his posture. Shown in Figure 7 are four renderings of Oswald’s body taken from the front, back, and left and right sides, each of which look qualitatively reasonable. The tilt of Oswald’s body was measured to be a physically plausible five degrees from vertical.
3.4. Chin
At first glance it may appear that Oswald’s chin in the backyard photo is too wide to be consistent with his chin in other photos (e.g., his mugshot) and hence evidence of a photo composite. Shown in the left column of Figure 8 is a photo of Oswald from his mugshot (top) and from the backyard photo (bottom). The yellow guidelines are drawn at the point in the top photo where the chin meets the jaw line. Note that the chin appears to be much wider in the backyard photo. Shown in the right column of Figure 8 are the corresponding 3-D renderings with neutral front lighting (top) and lighting to match the backyard photo (bottom). The yellow guidelines, of the same width as on the left, show the same apparent widening of the chin. From these 3-D renderings, it is clear that the apparent widening of the chin is due to the shading* along the chin and jaw, and not to nefarious photo manipulation.

https://farid.berkeley.edu/downloads/publications/tr10.pdf