On The Trail Of Delusion

[Fred Litwin]

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/david-lifton-writes-to-oliver-stone

Published by permission of David Lifton, who pointed out that his disagreements with Stone and Garrison were not about the existence of a conspiracy or the importance of foreign-policy issues to the assassination.  This letter was published ten years after his book, Best Evidence: Disguise and Deception in the Assassination of John F. Kennedy.

[Fred Litwin]

Is this Document the Smoking Gun on the Richard Case Nagell Story?
Dick Russell, in the first edition of his book The Man Who Knew Too Much, included one page from a document that he considered the "smoking gun." I publish all four pages today, and it is not a smoking gun in the slightest. If this is the only documentation, Russell can cite, then he truly has no case.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/is-this-document-the-smoking-gun-on-the-richard-case-nagell-story

[Gerry Down]

What's notable is that the claim Nagell told to the Army in 1969 (as can be seen on page 2 of the 4 page document here: https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/is-this-document-the-smoking-gun-on-the-richard-case-nagell-story ) is that this claim is quiet simple. It does not have all the bells and whistles it does when it shows up in Russells book (ie a photo of Oswald and Nagell together being stashed away in a Switzerland bank vault, tape recordings of Oswald, and Nagells order to kill Oswald).

Is it possible that the simple version Nagell gives to the army in 1969 is the truth and then Nagell inflated this simple story when he told it to Russell in order to, as is stated at the end of that 4 page document, to embarrass the CIA?

[Walt Cakebread]

What's notable is that the claim Nagell told to the Army in 1969 (as can be seen on page 2 of the 4 page document here: https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/is-this-document-the-smoking-gun-on-the-richard-case-nagell-story ) is that this claim is quiet simple. It does not have all the bells and whistles it does when it shows up in Russells book (ie a photo of Oswald and Nagell together being stashed away in a Switzerland bank vault, tape recordings of Oswald, and Nagells order to kill Oswald).

Is it possible that the simple version Nagell gives to the army in 1969 is the truth and then Nagell inflated this simple story when he told it to Russell in order to, as is stated at the end of that 4 page document, to embarrass the CIA?

The LA TIMES the NY TIMES and others reported that Richard Nagell during his arraignment stated that,  quote... " That The FBI held full responsibility for Kennedy's assassination " Nagell was immediately led out of court by "Federal men" ...unquote

Question.... What was the charge that Nagell was being arraigned on when he said this???

[Fred Litwin]

Why Didn't Richard Case Nagell Testify at Clay Shaw's Trial?
Did somebody throw a grenade at Nagell in New York? Dick Russell has one reason why he didn't testify, Jim Garrison offers another reason. But wait, Richard Case Nagell has a third reason. Does any of this make any sense?

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/why-didn-t-richard-case-nagell-testify-at-clay-shaw-s-trial

[Walt Cakebread]

Is this Document the Smoking Gun on the Richard Case Nagell Story?
Dick Russell, in the first edition of his book The Man Who Knew Too Much, included one page from a document that he considered the "smoking gun." I publish all four pages today, and it is not a smoking gun in the slightest. If this is the only documentation, Russell can cite, then he truly has no case.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/is-this-document-the-smoking-gun-on-the-richard-case-nagell-story

Richard Case Nagell KNEW the truth ......  He knew the murder was sanctioned at the highest level of the FBI.....and he knew that Lee Oswald was the scapegoat.....

[Fred Litwin]

Post your evidence.