On The Trail Of Delusion

[Fred Litwin]

I could just post on the board and tell people to buy my book. Instead, I have started a
blog with primary Garrison documents. I think that is of value to a lot of people, and if
people want to buy my book, well, that would be good too.

Over the last two years, I have traveled to every archive in the United States that
has primary Garrison documents  - the papers o Elmer Gertz (he was Gordon Novel's
lawyer); the papers of James Kirkwood; the papers of Patricia Lambert; The papers
of George Lardner, and many others.

So, check out my blog, and I think you can see my posts
have primary documents NOT on the web elsewhere.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/blog

fred

[John Tonkovich]

Often, writers start websites as a marketing tool.

[Fred Litwin]

Yes, as I did. But, I post primary Garrison documents everyday.
For instance, Garrison's two memos on propinquity are not
available anywhere on the web except on my blog. I posted
a statement from Joel Palmer, a Garrison investigator, that
has not been published elsewhere.

fred

[Fred Litwin]

Jim Garrison's Playboy Interview - What Couldn't Be Published

The October 1967 issue of Playboy contained its longest ever interview - 20,000 words with Jim Garrison. Over five million copies were printed and it gave Garrison huge exposure.

Today, I have posted, for the first time ever, Sylvia Meagher's 3-page letter to Playboy about the interview. She wasn't too happy.

And, also for the first time ever, a memo that interviewer Eric Norden sent to Playboy with information from Garrison that was too confidential to put in the magazine. Garrison wanted to show Playboy that he had the 'stuff' and so several confidential memos were written to convince them.

This week: The other secret Playboy memos.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/blog

[John Tonkovich]

Cynic Tonkovich doesn't understand -- much less appreciate -- the concept of primary research, and the work it represents.

Thank you, Fred.

Having read the "primary research" of Tom Purvis, and inasmuch as I do "appreciate" his amazing work, I would have to disagree.
Oxford defines "cynic" as "a person who believes that people are motivated purely by self interest rather than acting for honorable or unselfish reasons."
Bugliosi, Mailer, Posner - plagiarist who presented "secondary " research as "primary" - and others certainly come to mind.
"Cynic"? Yes, I am guilty as charged. Happily so.

[W. Tracy Parnell]

Often, writers start websites as a marketing tool.

Yes John, Fred is marketing his book. The reason he is doing that is because it is self-published. I happen to believe that it is a valuable project that uses new material to expose the Garrison fraud. But anyone can make up their own mind and ignore him if they wish.

[W. Tracy Parnell]

Great stuff Fred.