Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The First Shot  (Read 553351 times)

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4023
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #1778 on: Today at 02:56:34 AM »
Wipe that egg off your weenie and pull your pants back up, you're starting to embarrass yourself worse than usual.

What she got RIGHT, at least insofar as her location goes, was in 1993 and 2015. What she got absurdly, completely WRONG was MINUTES AFTER THE JFKA. If her statements in 1993 strike you as problematical, then you must think her 1963 article was correct. Hello? Or is it "Mary was soooooooo traumatized, dude, that she forgot where the hell she was and made numerous other misstatements based on being at that location, but by God she was rock-solid on her description of the shots" - hello, really, ya think?

What a bizarro. Let it go.

Dear MGFPR,

Why are you so riled up?

-- Tom

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The First Shot
« Reply #1778 on: Today at 02:56:34 AM »


Offline Lance Payette

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1735
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #1779 on: Today at 03:01:21 AM »
Since TG's OCD requires us to live with two Mary Woodward threads, I guess I will have to post my insightful contributions on both, to wit:

We have failed to mention wacky Mary's FBI interview of 12/7/63. It's clear she crossed from Houston to Elm. Nothing about the grassy knoll. It conveniently omits the timing of the second and third shots. Now she first thought the shots had come from "above and possibly behind" her. Then she thought they might have come from the overpass. All she can really say is that the shots came from above her head. She had seen five or six people on the overpass, and this may be why her "first reaction" (what?) was to look there. However, she never saw anything in the hands of those people.

She's worthless.

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh24/html/WH_Vol24_0269b.htm

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4023
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #1780 on: Today at 03:30:34 AM »
Since TG's OCD requires us to live with two Mary Woodward threads, I guess I will have to post my insightful contributions on both, to wit:

We have failed to mention wacky Mary's FBI interview of 12/7/63. It's clear she crossed from Houston to Elm. Nothing about the grassy knoll. It conveniently omits the timing of the second and third shots. Now she first thought the shots had come from "above and possibly behind" her. Then she thought they might have come from the overpass. All she can really say is that the shots came from above her head. She had seen five or six people on the overpass, and this may be why her "first reaction" (what?) was to look there. However, she never saw anything in the hands of those people.

She's worthless.

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh24/html/WH_Vol24_0269b.htm

Dear MGFPR,

Your "throwing the baby out with the bathwater" vis-a-vis Woodward's 11/23/63 DMN article reeks, as usual, of gaslighting desperation.

-- Tom
« Last Edit: Today at 03:51:01 AM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The First Shot
« Reply #1780 on: Today at 03:30:34 AM »