The First Shot

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The First Shot  (Read 464309 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #315 on: November 24, 2020, 03:18:47 PM »
If a person sincerely believes what he proposes than he cannot be called a liar.
The target can be easily tracked through that foliage and fired upon when in the clear.
The twofer landed at the junction where the neck meets the back.
The rifling in the Carcano barrel grabs the bullet near the front, cutting down flight wobble and produces a very stable and accurate flight path.
« Last Edit: November 24, 2020, 03:23:55 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3775
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #316 on: November 24, 2020, 06:35:34 PM »
That is correct.  Well before z207, which is when the FBI determined the earliest time that JFK was clear of the tree from the 6th floor sniper's nest. He was clear almost a second earlier judging by the Secret Service film.

Hmmm...
If JFK isn't clear of the foliage until z207 and the graphic Jerry posted above has JFK still in the foliage at z186 this surely means a shot at z190 would have been through the foliage.
Am I missing something?

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1751
    • SPMLaw
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #317 on: November 24, 2020, 07:45:32 PM »
I notice that Warren Commission Exhibit CE 907 is a film of the FBI re-enactment done on May 24, 1964. Does anyone know where I might view this film (other than going to NARA)? 

Also, I would like to know how the Secret Service film done in December 5, 1963 was documented.  The film does not appear to be an exhibit to either the WC or HSCA although stills from what appears to be a similar re-enactment done the same day but which is not in the film are found in CE875.

Offline Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3775
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #318 on: November 24, 2020, 11:01:51 PM »
I notice that Warren Commission Exhibit CE 907 is a film of the FBI re-enactment done on May 24, 1964. Does anyone know where I might view this film (other than going to NARA)? 

Also, I would like to know how the Secret Service film done in December 5, 1963 was documented.  The film does not appear to be an exhibit to either the WC or HSCA although stills from what appears to be a similar re-enactment done the same day but which is not in the film are found in CE875.

It is almost certain that JFK is completely covered by the foliage a z190. There is no way a shot would be taken at this point. I feel this is going to be very difficult for anyone proposing a shot at z190 to get away from.

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5166
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #319 on: November 24, 2020, 11:05:37 PM »
The SS simulated the Limo position at a number of Zapruder frames and compared these locations to what Oswald would see through his scope from his Sniper's nest, but unfortunately the Limo the SS used was not the same model so the position of Connally as compared to Kennedy could not be accurately recreated and has led many people to say that the positions of the two men does not support the Single Bullet Fact.





A direct comparison between Z225(a fraction of a second after the SBF) and the SS recreation shows that the Connally stand-in was too high and too close to the side of the Limo, now when we align the corrected position with the SS recreation we can see that Connally indeed was in the location that fully supports the SBF.



Connally's jacket billows as the bullet passes through.



Both men react simultaneously.



JohnM
« Last Edit: November 24, 2020, 11:22:33 PM by John Mytton »

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1751
    • SPMLaw
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #320 on: November 24, 2020, 11:19:37 PM »
Hmmm...
If JFK isn't clear of the foliage until z207 and the graphic Jerry posted above has JFK still in the foliage at z186 this surely means a shot at z190 would have been through the foliage.
Am I missing something?
The FBI conclusion that JFK was not clear of the foliage (that is, the foliage in late May 1964) until z207 is based on their re-enactment using the Secret Service car (the "Queen Mary") from which this photo is made:

Even based on that photo from the FBI re-enactment, we can see everything back to the rear of the car which was about 7 feet behind JFK.  So JFK would have been visible 7 feet earlier.  At a foot a frame, that brings it down to z200 even in the re-enactment.

But it is not really an accurate re-enactment.  The foliage Oswald saw was similar to that depicted in the December 1963 Secret Service film which is somewhat less full than in May 64.  The president just had to move past the centre of the outer branch to be quite visible:


Also, because they used the wrong car, you can see that JFK does not appear in quite the same position from Zapruder's position in the reenactment:


So, in my view JFK was in Oswald's sights several frames before z200.  I may be over-stating it a bit at z190 but I think it is safe to say JFK was clear to Oswald by z195.  But more significant perhaps is the fact that the tree branches never completely obscured Oswald's view so Oswald could have sighted on the edge of the leaves, tracked the car aiming at a point about 2 feet in from the right side of the car and fired as soon as JFK was just about to come into the sights or cross-hairs (depending on which he was using).
« Last Edit: November 24, 2020, 11:53:54 PM by Andrew Mason »

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1751
    • SPMLaw
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #321 on: November 24, 2020, 11:31:59 PM »


A direct comparison between Z225(a fraction of a second after the SBF) and the SS recreation shows that the Connally stand-in was too high and too close to the side of the Limo, now when we align the corrected position with the SS recreation we can see that Connally indeed was in the location that fully supports the SBF.

Thanks for posting the above composite gif which shows that the relative positions of JFK and JBC in the re-enactment are very accurate except for their relative height.

We can see through the crosshairs of the re-enactment view from the SN that the path through JFK goes to the left of Governor Connally's midline which is no where near his right armpit, even if you lowered the jump seat.  How do you explain that this is consistent with the single bullet "fact"?
« Last Edit: November 24, 2020, 11:32:52 PM by Andrew Mason »