The First Shot

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The First Shot  (Read 448871 times)

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
    • SPMLaw
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #924 on: May 17, 2022, 10:32:48 PM »
Tague claims he was hit on the second shot, but his statement is he turned his head away from the motorcade for the second shot.
Which is, possibly, why he was struck on the right cheek.


Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1327
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #925 on: May 19, 2022, 03:18:13 PM »
Jack, I asked you to specify which universe you were operating in.  It is obviously not the one the rest of us are in.

Obviously, there won't be any proof of a third shot coming, let alone "overwhelming evidence". In your universe there seems to be a lot of clowns. On the positive side, it appears you are their leader.

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1327
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #926 on: May 19, 2022, 03:26:11 PM »
Which is, possibly, why he was struck on the right cheek.

Your time would be better spent on the "overwhelming evidence" of a third shot. Even Tague's statement does not support your bizarre theory. Interesting, he has a second shot head shot.

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
    • SPMLaw
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #927 on: May 20, 2022, 01:27:49 AM »
Your time would be better spent on the "overwhelming evidence" of a third shot. Even Tague's statement does not support your bizarre theory. Interesting, he has a second shot head shot.
I have given you the abundant and overwhelming evidence of three shots.  You just disagree with it. That doesn't mean it does not exist.

As far Tague's evidence is concerned, I have no idea what you are referring to.  Here is what he said under oath (7 H 555):

Mr. LIEBELER Do you have any idea which bullet might have made that mark?
Mr. TAGUE. I would guess it was either the second or third. I wouldn’t say
definitely on which one.
Mr. LIEBELER . Did you hear any more shots after you felt yourself get hit in the face?
Mr. TAGUE. I believe I did.
Mr. LIEBELER. You think you did?
Mr. TAGUE. I believe I did.
Mr. LIEBELER. How many?
Mr. TAGUE. I believe that it was the second shot, so I heard the third shot afterwards.

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1327
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #928 on: May 20, 2022, 04:06:22 PM »
I have given you the abundant and overwhelming evidence of three shots.  You just disagree with it. That doesn't mean it does not exist.

As far Tague's evidence is concerned, I have no idea what you are referring to.  Here is what he said under oath (7 H 555):

Mr. LIEBELER Do you have any idea which bullet might have made that mark?
Mr. TAGUE. I would guess it was either the second or third. I wouldn’t say
definitely on which one.
Mr. LIEBELER . Did you hear any more shots after you felt yourself get hit in the face?
Mr. TAGUE. I believe I did.
Mr. LIEBELER. You think you did?
Mr. TAGUE. I believe I did.
Mr. LIEBELER. How many?
Mr. TAGUE. I believe that it was the second shot, so I heard the third shot afterwards.

I am sure you don't understand.

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
    • SPMLaw
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #929 on: May 24, 2022, 09:16:40 PM »
I am sure you don't understand.
I agree. I am sure I don't understand why you think there is "No evidence at all that there ever was a third shot".

Offline John Tonkovich

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 732
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #930 on: May 25, 2022, 08:50:31 PM »
 Three shots.
Three holes in Kennedy.