The First Shot

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The First Shot  (Read 448962 times)

Online Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1872
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #147 on: November 03, 2020, 06:57:53 PM »
I see her just running alongside the parade, she can't keep up so she stops running. It'd be weird if she followed them through the triple underpass. It's like 'head turns', people pick a spot for a shot in the Z-film and whatever happens around that moment becomes instantly suspicious. She is just running alongside the limo, probably trying to keep up with Jackie, who appears to be watching the little girl running at one point. Maybe she did hear a noise but, as you point out, no-one else reacted to it.
But she said in several interviews that she slowed and then stopped after hearing a gun shot.

And yes, it's dangerous to engage in a sort of "confirmation bias", selecting that piece of evidence (as one sees it) to support their view.

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3774
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #148 on: November 03, 2020, 07:18:43 PM »
But she said in several interviews that she slowed and then stopped after hearing a gun shot.

And yes, it's dangerous to engage in a sort of "confirmation bias", selecting that piece of evidence (as one sees it) to support their view.

As I've said elsewhere Steve, if you watch the Z-film Rosemary slows down and stops but the car load of SS agents show no sign of reacting to a potential gunshot. Although not impossible, It's my personal outlook that this is really unlikely, particularly when we see what appear to be serious reactions in Altgens6, reactions that are confirmed by the testimony of the agents themselves.
As I say, this is more of a personal opinion on this issue.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2020, 07:20:47 PM by Dan O'meara »

Online Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1872
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #149 on: November 03, 2020, 10:15:43 PM »
As I've said elsewhere Steve, if you watch the Z-film Rosemary slows down and stops but the car load of SS agents show no sign of reacting to a potential gunshot. Although not impossible, It's my personal outlook that this is really unlikely, particularly when we see what appear to be serious reactions in Altgens6, reactions that are confirmed by the testimony of the agents themselves.
As I say, this is more of a personal opinion on this issue.
Dan: As you know, you can drive yourself nuts trying to discern a first shot from looking at the crowd. It's puzzling as hell.

Not sure if this was cited. It's a longish article on Willis:

https://www.washingtondecoded.com/site/2013/12/redskirt.html

I don't agree with all of it but it has some interesting points.

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3774
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #150 on: November 04, 2020, 12:25:07 AM »
Dan: As you know, you can drive yourself nuts trying to discern a first shot from looking at the crowd. It's puzzling as hell.

Not sure if this was cited. It's a longish article on Willis:

https://www.washingtondecoded.com/site/2013/12/redskirt.html

I don't agree with all of it but it has some interesting points.

IMO the only reactions that have any validity when examining the Z-film for shots are those of JFK and JBC after they have been hit. Everything else seems to be a matter of interpretation.
I also find the lack of reaction by the SS agents telling when compared to their obvious reactions in Altgens 6.
The article does have some interesting insights, particularly concerning the reactions of Landis and Ready but I couldn't disagree more with the following assessment:

"Ms. Willis’s sudden head turn towards the Book Depository in the first ½ second of the Zapruder film is the film’s earliest unambiguous evidence that the first shot happened before Z133."

"Unambiguous evidence"? Not convinced by that, just as I'm not convinced by a 'pre-Zapruder' shot for reasons outlined above.

"Puzzling as hell" - I'll definitely go for that  Thumb1:

Offline John Tonkovich

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 732
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #151 on: November 04, 2020, 04:40:50 AM »
Who is this   " Mason " you mention ?
It's a simple question.

Offline Denis Pointing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #152 on: November 04, 2020, 12:56:18 PM »
Who is this   " Mason " you mention ?
It's a simple question.

Andrew Mason.  Reply #145 on: October 30, 2020, 05:58:56 PM
                        Reply #149 on: November 02, 2020, 03:53:24 PM
« Last Edit: November 04, 2020, 12:57:34 PM by Denis Pointing »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #153 on: November 04, 2020, 02:10:58 PM »
IMO the only reactions that have any validity when examining the Z-film for shots are those of JFK and JBC after they have been hit. Everything else seems to be a matter of interpretation.
I also find the lack of reaction by the SS agents telling when compared to their obvious reactions in Altgens 6.
The article does have some interesting insights, particularly concerning the reactions of Landis and Ready but I couldn't disagree more with the following assessment:

"Ms. Willis’s sudden head turn towards the Book Depository in the first ½ second of the Zapruder film is the film’s earliest unambiguous evidence that the first shot happened before Z133."

"Unambiguous evidence"? Not convinced by that, just as I'm not convinced by a 'pre-Zapruder' shot for reasons outlined above.

"Puzzling as hell" - I'll definitely go for that  Thumb1:

One of the more unambiguous descriptions of when the first shot occurred comes from Victoria Adams. Here is a link to a thread I started a while back regarding this:

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2647.0.html

The fact that Victoria’s position and the position of the tree that blocked her view are stationary positions is what makes her description less ambiguous than many others.