Infamy = Glory??

[Zeon Mason]

IDK why LN have concluded that conspiracy is out of the question

The  theory that iF Oswalds is the one and only assassin , that his motive may be due to OCD and or schizophrenia is certainly a possibility.

The high school counselor thought Oswald might have had delusions of grandeur. However, it’s not  really unusual that teenagers may exhibit such symptoms.

There were the incidents of Oswald supposedly shooting himself in the USMC and the incident supposedly of attempting to slit his wrists in the USSR.

Not really sure myself if these events happened or not , however, EVEN IF they did and EVEN IF this can be posited as some kind of “evidence” to support a lone gunman theory, there is STILL a possibility of a conspiracy to USE this mentally unstable person and place him in proximity to JFK offered  on a silver platter, totally exposed,  and knowing just by arranging that simple proximity event, that the mentally unstable USMC defector will very likely act on his impulse.

[Bill Chapman]

Not only is that a false quote (shame on you), but there’s no contradiction either. You can be ignorant about something and still refuse to admit it.

You've always said that I don't know anything about the assassination, in one way or another. Here's a variant:



There are several more variants in my files and I'll be posting them as I come across them. For all to see.

Run, Johnny... run.

[John Iacoletti]

You've always said that I don't know anything about the assassination, in one way or another. Here's a variant:

“Variant”, LOL.

I guess that’s your way of apologizing for falsely quoting me earlier. Apology accepted!

[Bill Chapman]

“Variant”, LOL.

I guess that’s your way of apologizing for falsely quoting me earlier. Apology accepted!

Guess again

Variant: something that is slightly different from other similar things
And you forgot my 'in one way or another' qualifier

Go ahead, ignore my cite

You're so easy to catch out
You're not running fast enough

[Jerry Freeman]

What Chapman in his infinite wisdom refuses to admit is that the WC hypothesis has its own set of logical fallacies.

infinite indefinable wisdom....there-- fixed it for you
 

[John Iacoletti]

Go ahead, ignore my cite

Your “cite” of me saying something different from what you quoted me as saying?

You really suck at this, don’t you?

[Bill Chapman]

Your “cite” of me saying something different from what you quoted me as saying?

You really suck at this, don’t you?

You're more desperate than you used to be
And Weidmann seems evermore 'thirsty'