Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?  (Read 57766 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #105 on: October 22, 2020, 02:54:09 AM »
I'm not sure if Walt likes to think..period.

Well At least I'm not a gullible simpleton who believes the BS that LBJ's "Special Select Blue Ribbon Committee" created for simple suckers. 
I can fit the evidence together and see a solution that makes sense.....   

Offline Denis Pointing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #106 on: October 22, 2020, 03:11:00 AM »
Well At least I'm not a gullible simpleton who believes the BS that LBJ's "Special Select Blue Ribbon Committee" created for simple suckers. 
I can fit the evidence together and see a solution that makes sense.....   

The only way you make the evidence fit is by lying thru your teeth and fabrication. How do you know when Cakebread's lying...when his lips move. LOL

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #107 on: October 22, 2020, 03:15:19 AM »
The only way you make the evidence fit is by lying thru your teeth and fabrication. How do you know when Cakebread's lying...when his lips move. LOL


"How do you know when Cakebread's lying...when his lips move." LOL


Wow!...Is that a Pointing original?....or just more indication that you don't have the brain for original thought.   

Offline Denis Pointing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #108 on: October 22, 2020, 03:22:25 AM »

"How do you know when Cakebread's lying...when his lips move." LOL


Wow!...Is that a Pointing original?....or just more indication that you don't have the brain for original thought.

Yeah, you're right it's not very original...you've been caught lying scores of times.  :D :D

Offline John Tonkovich

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 732
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #109 on: October 22, 2020, 04:33:22 PM »
The concept of " truthiness" seems to inform some of our members' posts. : )
I will say no more.
As to the rifle order, still waiting for info on USPO/USPS logistics in 1963 re: Dallas to Chicago mail delivery. I have no dog in this fight; it may well turn out that a letter posted on the morning of "Day 1" in Dallas could arrive on "Day 2" in Chicago. In 1963.
Answers?
Help?
Bueller?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #110 on: October 22, 2020, 05:42:23 PM »
Well At least I'm not a gullible simpleton who believes the BS that LBJ's "Special Select Blue Ribbon Committee" created for simple suckers. 
I can fit the evidence together and see a solution that makes sense.....   

It's one thing to see a solution that "makes sense".  It's quite another to state it as a fact.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #111 on: October 22, 2020, 06:09:10 PM »
The concept of " truthiness" seems to inform some of our members' posts. : )
I will say no more.
As to the rifle order, still waiting for info on USPO/USPS logistics in 1963 re: Dallas to Chicago mail delivery. I have no dog in this fight; it may well turn out that a letter posted on the morning of "Day 1" in Dallas could arrive on "Day 2" in Chicago. In 1963.
Answers?
Help?
Bueller?

"it may well turn out that a letter posted on the morning of "Day 1" in Dallas could arrive on "Day 2" in Chicago."

Yes, If the letter left Dallas in the am  it's feasible that Kleins received and processed the order the next day....  I believe that is feasible.

And since I believe that George De M, was the person who bought the money order and sent the order to Kleins, he certainly was not confined to a work place or a schedule. 

People can't seem to understand that the rifle was ordered about a month before the "attempt " to shoot General Walker and it's insane to believe that Lee was plotting to murder JFK nine months before the murder on November 22nd 1963.   The purchase of the rifle in March had NOTHING to do with the coup d e'tat in November......     However...The FBI Knew that Lee had received the rifle from Klein's ( They were watching him because Hoover thought the Oswald's were Russian agents)  Therefore they had all of the documentation about the purchase of the rifle way back in March of 1963....