Ted Callaway & The 1:15 Shooting

[Martin Weidmann]

Btw, in your previous post (before you edited it again) you falsely claimed about Markham that she said "the Tippit thing happened at around 4pm" and that she wasn't interested in time
I didn't quote her saying that.

BS

Regardless if you call it a quote or not, you claimed she said it;

She also said 'number two'. She also said the Tippit thing happened at around 4pm (after earlier saying she left her house just after 1pm) and that she wasn't interested in the time. She also said she was nervous. Now tell us she had all her wits about her during testimony.

Seems it came down to her emotional response, fair lineup or not.

That you altered the post after I quoted it in my reply, doesn't alter anything. You said it!

So, stop lying.

[Bill Chapman]

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2664.msg95211.html#msg95211

You clearly don't have any knowledge about how prosecutors can work when they don't get the answer they want from a witness.
I linked to that sort of thing a few weeks ago in 'off-topics'
Don't Talk to the Cops
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2664.msg95211.html#msg95211

Mr. BALL. Did you recognize anyone in the lineup?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No, sir.
Mr. BALL. You did not? Did you see anybody--I have asked you that question before did you recognize anybody from their face?
Mrs. MARKHAM. From their face, no.
Mr. BALL. Did you identify anybody in these four people?
Mrs. MARKHAM. I didn't know nobody.
Mr. BALL. I know you didn't know anybody, but did anybody in that lineup look like anybody you had seen before?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No. I had never seen none of them, none of these men.
Mr. BALL. No one of the four?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No one of them.
Mr. BALL. No one of all four?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No, sir.
Mr. BALL. Was there a number two man in there?
Mrs. MARKHAM. Number two is the one I picked.
Another example of Ball frustration and witness oddball responses

A clear case of leading the witness. Not allowed in court as it is witness manipulation!
A clear case of Ball frustration with Markham's space-cadet responses.

It is amazing just how clueless you truly are
Its amazing how dependant you seem be on ad-homs.

Btw, in your previous post (before you edited it again) you falsely claimed about Markham that she said "the Tippit thing happened at around 4pm" and that she wasn't interested in time;
My saying 'the Tippit thing' should a clue that I didn't actually quote her.

In this post your have exposed yourself as a liar, as she was actually talking about the line up being at 4pm and it is fully understandable that she wasn't interested in the time, at that moment, having seen a man being shot earlier that day.
In this post I have exposed myself as seeing the line 'what time did you see the man in the lineup' either as:
1) what time did you see the man during the lineup
2) what time did you see the man, in the lineup, at the scene.

Why do you want to be taken seriously, when you misrepresent evidence or refuse to even present any to back up your bogus claims?
I have no need to be taken seriously by you lot.

[Martin Weidmann]

You clearly don't have any knowledge about how prosecutors can work when they don't get the answer they want from a witness.
I linked to that sort of thing a few weeks ago in 'off-topics'
Don't Talk to the Cops
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2664.msg95211.html#msg95211

Mr. BALL. Did you recognize anyone in the lineup?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No, sir.
Mr. BALL. You did not? Did you see anybody--I have asked you that question before did you recognize anybody from their face?
Mrs. MARKHAM. From their face, no.
Mr. BALL. Did you identify anybody in these four people?
Mrs. MARKHAM. I didn't know nobody.
Mr. BALL. I know you didn't know anybody, but did anybody in that lineup look like anybody you had seen before?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No. I had never seen none of them, none of these men.
Mr. BALL. No one of the four?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No one of them.
Mr. BALL. No one of all four?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No, sir.
Mr. BALL. Was there a number two man in there?
Mrs. MARKHAM. Number two is the one I picked.
Another example of Ball frustration and witness oddball responses

A clear case of leading the witness. Not allowed in court as it is witness manipulation!
A clear case of Ball frustration with Markham's space-cadet responses.

It is amazing just how clueless you truly are
Its amazing how dependant you seem be on ad-homs.

Btw, in your previous post (before you edited it again) you falsely claimed about Markham that she said "the Tippit thing happened at around 4pm" and that she wasn't interested in time;
My saying 'the Tippit thing' should a clue that I didn't actually quote her.

In this post your have exposed yourself as a liar, as she was actually talking about the line up being at 4pm and it is fully understandable that she wasn't interested in the time, at that moment, having seen a man being shot earlier that day.
In this post I have exposed myself as seeing the line 'what time did you see the man in the lineup' either as:
1) what time did you see the man during the lineup
2) what time did you see the man, in the lineup, at the scene.

Why do you want to be taken seriously, when you misrepresent evidence or refuse to even present any to back up your bogus claims?
I have no need to be taken seriously.

Btw, in your previous post (before you edited it again) you falsely claimed about Markham that she said "the Tippit thing happened at around 4pm" and that she wasn't interested in time;

My saying 'the Tippit thing' should a clue that I didn't actually quote her.

I never said you quoted her. You claimed she said it and she didn't. Period!

In this post your have exposed yourself as a liar, as she was actually talking about the line up being at 4pm and it is fully understandable that she wasn't interested in the time, at that moment, having seen a man being shot earlier that day.
In this post I have exposed myself as seeing the line 'what time did you see the man in the lineup' either as:
1) what time did you see the man during the lineup
2) what time did you see the man, in the lineup, at the scene.

So, now you are trying to weasel your way out of this one by claiming ignorance of the facts? 

I have no need to be taken seriously.

That's the first honest thing I've seen you write on this board

[Bill Chapman]

I have no need to be taken seriously.

That's the first honest thing I've seen you write on this board

Again with the ad-hom

[Bill Chapman]

Translation: “stop pointing out all my errors!” Transl

Translation: “stop pointing out all my errors!”
Translation for contrarians: It says I prefer to publish right away: It punks nitpickers like you and Freeman into showing your pettiness, and at the same time exposing the CTer longstanding love affair with minutia.

[Martin Weidmann]

Again with the ad-hom

Telling the truth is not ad-hom, so stop whining. You get what you provoke and deserve, live with it, pussy

If you want to be treated differently try acting differently, more maturely, for once. But I doubt you can or want to....

[Bill Chapman]

Damned straight I am a 'nitpicker'.
Pick off enough and the lie is exposed 

Pick off enough and you'll become a walking-dead zombie. Like you lot for the last 57 years with only pet theories that never quite arrive at the station.