If that's true, then why didn't Oswald do what all the other fame-seeking assassins have done and proudly take credit for his deed? Instead, he doggedly proclaimed his innocence and insisted he did not shoot anyone. Why seek fame by shooting the president and then adamantly deny you shot anyone? Makes no sense.
We know that Oswald did not fire a rifle that day because all three tests that were done on the paraffin cast of his right check, including the super-sensitive NAA test, found no traces of nitrates. Even if he had washed his face after the shooting, there would have been nitrate traces in the paraffin mold that would have been detected by NAA.
We also know from released files that seven different men took part in the FBI's paraffin experiment. To test the reliability of the paraffin test on Oswald's cheek, the FBI had seven different men fire a Carcano rifle and then undergo a paraffin test. NAA detected nitrates in the paraffin molds of the men's right cheek every single time. Every. Single. Time.
'What you mean we, white man?' --- Tonto to the Lone Ranger, upon finding themselves surrounded by Indians aboriginals. In the meantime, Chef Mike, you have taken my bit of spoofing and turned it inside-out in order to once again toss yet another word-salad at those currently in attendance. That is your right. But to some attendees (for instance, those of us who don't know anything at all about the assassination [Iacoletti said that, so it must be true] are actually kinda, sorta... no, really, hoping you can help us identify those who, besides the shooter, knew that an attempt was going to made on Kennedy that day.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2020, 11:35:02 PM by Bill Chapman »
|