Anything other than 57 year old garbage discussed thousands upon thousands of times throughout the years? Interesting that the majority of historians, doctors, forensic pathologists, wound ballistics experts totally disagree with you. Is that one more conspiracy? Btw, I have never ruled out a conspiracy. What I’ve maintained throughout the decades is simple: Oswald, to a 100% certainty fired 3 and only 3 shots hitting JFK twice from above and behind. End of shooting. Was another faction pulling his strings? 57 years later, I don’t know. You don’t know. I can’t prove it nor can you. The readers on this forum whether pro or con re: shooting are well read. Repeating theories discussed ad nauseam for 50+ does nothing for your case.
The thoughts expressed above are so closely aligned with my own that I could have written it myself. I know that I've expressed a similar point of view numerous times over the years. I too am 100% certain that Oswald fired the shots that killed JFK and wounded JBC. I am equally certain he was the one who gunned down J. D. Tippit. In 63 years I have seen no credible evidence that Oswald was acting on behalf of anyone except himself. Logically, one cannot rule out a conspiracy no matter how unlikely it seems. If Oswald had even a single accomplice, perhaps a getaway driver who got cold feet, that would constitute a conspiracy. In that scenario, the body of evidence would be exactly the same as if Oswald acted alone. Beyond such a theoretical possibility, I see no reason to believe Oswald had any such co-conspirators and barring some game changing reveation all these years later, I have no reason to change my position.
I've come across the name Paul May in the archives of this forum as well as the John McAdams forum although to my best recollection, I don't believe I ever conversed directly with him. I have been very impressed by what I have read of what he has posted. His writings exhibit a great deal of simple common sense.
