Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Frederick Clements]

 That Stanton nonsense was debunked long ago. Sad that some still believe it.

Fred

[Dan O'meara]

That Stanton nonsense was debunked long ago. Sad that some still believe it.

Fred

Nice one. Can you point out to me where it was debunked and I'll drop it.

[John Iacoletti]

I assume you're a fat-Oswald-on-the-steps kind of guy. Good old fat, invisible, Lee Harvey Oswald.

Like you've demonstrated that prayer-blob is fat.   

[Dan O'meara]

Like you've demonstrated that prayer-blob is fat.   

Sure looks fat to me 

[Frederick Clements]

Right here on this forum. Look up earlier threads and posts by John and Alan.

Fred

[Dan O'meara]

Right here on this forum. Look up earlier threads and posts by John and Alan.

Fred

That's really vague Fred. Rather than have me spend days trawling through the forum just tell me what it is that debunks the Stanton ID. You're the one who said it's been debunked so obviously you know.
Unless, of course, you know nothing about it which would make your claim rather strange.

[Dan O'meara]

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,562.0.html



https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2194.0.html


Fred

Still hours of reading Fred (which I will get to in my own time).
Just tell me what it is that debunks the Stanton ID or say you don't know.
But don't claim something like that when you don't know, then pretend that you do.
It's important that avenues of investigation aren't shut off for no reason. I think the claim for it being Oswald on the steps is non-existent. There is literally nothing to make the ID yet others are quite ferocious in their defence of this non-idea. It smacks of intellectual bullying (I use the word 'intellectual' very loosely).
The case for Stanton as prayer-blob is many times more superior to that of Oswald (IMHO) but it seems like those who shout the loudest are the ones who get heard.