If Baker is telling the truth he confronted Oswald on the second floor.
If Officer Baker is telling the truth in his 11/22/63 affidavit, he confronted a man
walking away from the stairway on
a floor higher than two! Why on earth should we favor months-later WC testimony over a same-day statement?
Now! As Officer Baker is giving this very affidavit, Mr Oswald is brought into the Homicide Office in front of his eyes-------------yet Officer Baker clearly doesn't recognize him as the man he had confronted... the affidavit makes
no connection between
the man just brought in and
the man I caught walking away from the stairway. If he
does recognize the man just brought in, then it will have been as the man he asked for help as he was entering the front door of the building. In which case it is perhaps already dawning on Officer Baker just what a tangled web he has gotten caught up in...
If the recorded words are true Baker confronted Oswald just as he reached the front door.
Either way, Oswald is inside the building at the time of the assassination
Slow down! Who is the 'he' in "as he reached the front door"? Officer Baker or Mr Oswald?
Officer Baker, in his 11/22/63 affidavit, tells us that as he was entering the front door he asked "several people" who were "standing around" where the stairs were. Who can these
several people have been, and where exactly do you think they were standing---------inside or outside?
This is in accordance with the video evidence of Oswald saying exactly this. ("In" meaning "inside" in this case)
If it were "exactly this", you wouldn't need to change "in" to "inside"! And your switcheroo doesn't even begin to dispose of the Hosty draft report: "Then went outside to watch P. parade".
While you're there, Mr O'Meara, have you come up with a credible alternative candidate for Prayer Man yet? (Mr Barber seems to have run away!)