Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Alan Ford]

   Depends at what point following the assassination your "conspiracy" is referring to. A person's story/testimony can be "massaged" into many different versions to fit whatever the desired narrative might be. You do Know that they did 3 "walk through's" with Baker prior to his WC Testimony? These "walk through's" included the motorcycle riding, running into the TSBD, etc. By the time Baker gave his WC Testimony, he was like an actor inna stage play. He knew where his "marks" were, he had his lines down to a T. The Baker WC Testimony was a farce. His LIVE actions, (or lack thereof), on 11/22/63 reveal far more than his rehearsed/canned WC testimony.

Agreed 100%------Officer Baker went along with the post-assassination conspiracy to cover up the truth. And the first of the lies he had to tell is exposed by the Darnell film

[Michael Welch]

Previously discussed and posted:
https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/28136-prayerperson/?do=findComment&comment=471704

Hi Chris and Brian, I hope that you both are doing well! In this picture of Lee in the hallway, you can see his hairline matches Prayer Man and probably his neckline does as well.



In the backyard photo, notice Lee's right arm looks skinny like Prayer Man's right arm.



Notice in this picture of Sarah Stanton, she has fatter arms, a fuller head of hair, and none of the characteristics of Prayer Man.



Sincerely yours, Michael

[Alan Ford]

'IF PRAYER MAN ISN'T STANTON, IT'S LHO!' ================> ILLOGICAL NONSENSE
'IF PRAYER MAN ISN'T LHO, IT'S STANTON!' ================> ILLOGICAL NONSENSE

Prayer Man in Darnell is
-----------neither Mr. Oswald nor Mrs. Stanton
-----------probably Mrs. Pauline Sanders

When there was a chance that Prayer Man in Darnell was Mr. Oswald, Prayer Man in Darnell was an object of intense, hi-stakes interest.

She is now an object of intense, hi-stakes interest only to those who need their eyes (and brains) tested.

It doesn't hugely matter who Prayer Man in Darnell is. Because she's a she. And Mr. Oswald is a he.

The smart folk have already moved on from what has become a tedious distraction. The stoopids are still mired in this zero-stakes yesterday-debate.........

[Chris Davidson]

The version Alan posted awhile ago had no specific provenance. There was a question of whether that version had been altered, in general(not by Alan). Don't know that answer, but I do know if you take one of the original Darnell frames Robin supplied and scale it up somewhat, here's what you get.
Is this similar to what Alan posted and James described at the 6th floor museum? Decide for yourself until a better version arises.





 

[John Iacoletti]

The version Alan posted awhile ago had no specific provenance.

Exactly.  The "scoop neckline" may be a fraud.  Either way, it looks nothing like Sarah Stanton.

[Alan Ford]

The version Alan posted awhile ago had no specific provenance. There was a question of whether that version had been altered, in general(not by Alan). Don't know that answer, but I do know if you take one of the original Darnell frames Robin supplied and scale it up somewhat, here's what you get.
Is this similar to what Alan posted and James described at the 6th floor museum? Decide for yourself until a better version arises.

Thank you, Mr. Davidson.

The version I posted was originally posted by Mr. Kamp (the red arrow is his), who evidently failed to see the significance of what he was posting.

One (just one) of the interesting things about it is the fact that it goes wider east than any previously available version. This is the only version where you'll get to see this fellow (green arrow):



Therefore it certainly is not an altered version of anything that was previously in the public domain.

And it's full of revelatory detail.

 

[Michael Welch]

Thank you, Mr. Davidson.

The version I posted was originally posted by Mr. Kamp (the red arrow is his), who evidently failed to see the significance of what he was posting.

One (just one) of the interesting things about it is the fact that it goes wider east than any previously available version. This is the only version where you'll get to see this fellow (green arrow):



Therefore it certainly is not an altered version of anything that was previously in the public domain.

And it's full of revelatory detail.

 

Hi Everybody, And please notice that a lady dressed in black is obscuring Lee from at least the waist down. Pauline and Sarah are on the East side of the steps. They cannot be in two places at once. All employees have been accounted for in other places! Thank you all for your input! Sincerely yours, Michael