Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Alan Ford]

Ask any random person if they can see Oswald or anyone in that clip.  Better yet take this to the NY Times and ask if they see Oswald in the clip.   Pack an overnight bag as some men with nets may be called. 

~Grin~



I, Richard Smith, can explain how Reddish Shirt Man in Hughes is Billy Lovelady. My explanation is as follows:............................................

If you're really so confident this is Mr. Lovelady in Hughes, then you should be only too happy to give your explanation. If you keep running away from the challenge, everyone reading can draw their own conclusions!

 

[Richard Smith]

~Grin~



I, Richard Smith, can explain how Reddish Shirt Man in Hughes is Billy Lovelady. My explanation is as follows:............................................

If you're really so confident this is Mr. Lovelady in Hughes, then you should be only too happy to give your explanation. If you keep running away from the challenge, everyone reading can draw their own conclusions!

 

I know who it isn't based on his own words and the evidence.  Not interested in playing whack-a-mole about every blurry image.  Again, though, if you think that shows Oswald standing outside please rush immediately to the NY Times and show this to them.  It is Pulitzer Prize winning stuff. 

[Alan Ford]

I know who it isn't based on his own words and the evidence.  Not interested in playing whack-a-mole about every blurry image.  Again, though, if you think that shows Oswald standing outside please rush immediately to the NY Times and show this to them.  It is Pulitzer Prize winning stuff.

~Grin~

Thanks for confirming that you can't defend your kooky claim that this is Mr. Lovelady! 

[Alan Ford]

Notice anything?

That's right. The respective elevations of Redshirt Man & Ms. Reese in Bell are an uncanny match for the respective elevations of Mr. Lovelady & Ms. Reese in the Wiegman frame.

Speaking of heights!

Look at where Mr. Oswald's right elbow is here in Hughes when Mr. Oswald has his hand raised: approximately the same height as the top of the head of the man in front of him (=Mr. Roy Lewis):



Now look at where 'Prayer Person's' right elbow is here in Wiegman (just a few seconds later) when they have their hand raised: about the same height as the top of the head of the man in front of them (= still Mr. Roy Lewis!).



Same movement; same height.

Are we sure this is a coincidence?

 

[Alan Ford]

Same movement; same height.

Are we sure this is a coincidence?

 

But!

There is obviously a much smaller distance between Mr. Oswald and Mr. Lewis in Hughes than between Prayer Person and Mr. Lewis in Wiegman. Right?



Well, appearances can be deceiving.............

Looking at the respective heights of Mr. Oswald's and Mr. Lewis' heads in Hughes, it would appear that Mr. Oswald is TWO steps behind Mr. Lewis:



This doesn't just mean that Mr. Oswald is at a substantial height advantage over Mr. Lewis, but also that he is at a substantial distance behind him.

Just like Prayer Person in Wiegman.

Are we sure this is just a coincidence?

 

[Richard Smith]

~Grin~

Thanks for confirming that you can't defend your kooky claim that this is Mr. Lovelady! 

Is John Fetterman in the room next to yours?

[Alan Ford]

This doesn't just mean that Mr. Oswald is at a substantial height advantage over Mr. Lewis, but also that he is at a substantial distance behind him.

Just like Prayer Person in Wiegman.

Are we sure this is just a coincidence?

 

Looking at these two scenes, we might now find ourselves reflecting that they are actually only just a few seconds apart:



Could it be---------we find ourselves wondering-----------that they are showing the same two men, one of whom (=the one standing higher up) is, in the later clip, simply repeating a hand movement (drinking) he made in the earlier clip?

Are you paying attention yet?