Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Jerry Freeman]

  ..this highlights the problem with rabid JFKA CT's, outside this single case, they have no real life experience!

Why are these snipes and pot shots necessary? A [trained in observation] policeman described the lunchroom man in affidavit and testimony. Wes Frazier who drove Oswald to work describes his [shirt-jacket] as baggy several times. So he couldn't remember the color. What color of shirt did you wear 2 days ago?
The claim that people that you don't even know... have "no real life experience" is based on some imaginary grandeur psychic abilities I suppose?

[Dan O'meara]

Why are these snipes and pot shots necessary? A [trained in observation] policeman described the lunchroom man in affidavit and testimony. Wes Frazier who drove Oswald to work describes his [shirt-jacket] as baggy several times. So he couldn't remember the color. What color of shirt did you wear 2 days ago?
The claim that people that you don't even know... have "no real life experience" is based on some imaginary grandeur psychic abilities I suppose?

Just to be clear, that quote isn't from me.
I posted part of a John Mytton post demonstrating the unreliability of witness statements regarding clothing.
I posted it because I think it highlights the problem of clinging on to a specific detail given in a witness statement without considering it's unreliability.
I'm sure you'll agree that the Mytton post is a powerful reminder of how unreliable a witness account of clothing can be.

LATER EDIT:

BTW Frazier is absolutely certain Oswald wore a light gray jacket to work that morning.

[Jerry Freeman]

BTW Frazier is absolutely certain Oswald wore a light gray jacket to work that morning.

Right... Oswald wore a grey jacket on the way to work and then after he left work, he took a cab wearing a blue jacket and went home and then [supposedly] changed into a grey jacket.
BTW--What color [again] of shirt did you wear 2 days ago?

[Jerry Freeman]

Just to be clear, that quote isn't from me....I posted part of a John Mytton post

The quotes were not posted correctly then. Also, there were no links to follow the [not very useful] information.
Even so... you appear to agree that an opposing viewpoint is from "rabid individuals who have no life experience".

[Dan O'meara]

That's not what he demonstrated.

You still don't get it.

LOL

You're quite correct Otto,
It's a matter of colour, not the actual garment.
It was a point being made about the multi-coloured  nature of the "jacket"

[Dan O'meara]

Right... Oswald wore a grey jacket on the way to work and then after he left work, he took a cab wearing a blue jacket and went home and then [supposedly] changed into a grey jacket.
BTW--What color [again] of shirt did you wear 2 days ago?

"...he took a cab wearing a blue jacket..."

You've been listening to Walt too much.
He described light blue pants made of a khaki material and a similar jacket.
He could be saying the jacket was also a very light colour and made of a khaki material.
If so, you're example scans as - wore a light grey jacket to work, got a cab wearing a light coloured jacket, went home and changed into a light grey jacket.
Mind blowing.

[Dan O'meara]

The quotes were not posted correctly then. Also, there were no links to follow the [not very useful] information.
Even so... you appear to agree that an opposing viewpoint is from "rabid individuals who have no life experience".

Is that a fact Jerry.

Just so we're clear, I don't think Oswald took the shots.
The subsequent investigation was profoundly incompetent and it is difficult to tell where the incompetence ends and the corruption starts.
And the WC hearings were a farce.

I hold an "opposing viewpoint" but give me an LNer over a CTer every time.