Pay close attention this time because your inability to understand the basic facts is truly embarrassing, My post had nothing to do with Fritz, all I asked was how Oswald who has the Press recording his every word, how would Oswald defend himself when asked if he shot the President and all the ammunition Oswald has, is to deny, and he even goes on to say that because he lived in Russia he was a Patsy again a lacklustre response from someone who knows he has no alibi, but if indeed he or anyone else on the Planet Earth was in a similar predicament and having the unprecedented platform of being completely accessible to the Press, they would just outright say they had a "perfect alibi" and clearly and emphatically declare that "I watched the President as he passed by the building and if you don't believe me check the cameras or ask my workmates because I was OUTSIDE!"
And I thought that speaking to your childlike brother Alan J. was as bad as you people can get.
Already explained, Mr Mytton, as well you know: Mr Oswald was manipulated by Fritz & Co. (your heroes) into believing that his claim to have been on the front steps had been verified but that he was on the hook for involvement in the assassination. The fact that you don't have a substantial counter-argument here is not my problem!
It was written on a piece of paper why would "they" simply suppress instead of destroy a piece of paper that "they" apparently never wanted to see the light of day? Doh!
The piece of paper was in the possession of Agent Hosty who------for whatever reason-------made a decision not to destroy it. What is on that piece of paper is utterly at odds with what is in the official interrogation reports. The fact that this is an utter disaster for Warren Gullibles like you is not my problem!
