Mr Ford is correct. Mrs Reid stated the bottle of coke was “full”.
So “unopened” was inaccurate.
Nevertheless, from Bakers and Trulys WC testimony neither saw anything in
Oswalds hands such as a bottle.
Maybe they were fibbing. IDK
If the coke that Reid saw was “full” then it’s not likely the bottle That PM was drinking while at the front steps.
Since Baker didn’t see anything in Oswalds hands then that coke that Mrs Reid saw in Oswalds hands could only be a coke Oswald bought AFTER having met Baker, whether on the 1st floor or the second floor.
On the rationale that because Mrs Reid was telling her story BEFORE Oswald was even yet a suspect, and that she was NOT a loon and or a liar, It is therefore necessary to integrate her story somehow with the Oswald=PM timeline.
Generally I am in agreement with PM=Oswald due to Mr Fords presentation of the Altgen photo anomaly of the upraised forearm and hand with a bottle in it (imo)
I see the logic of Mr.Ford relying on the Hosty reference to “coke” if one is going to accept the entire statement including “P.Parade”.
Walt apparently disagrees with the PM=Oswald theory and seems to think my attempt to construct a timeline for PM is analogous to some act that is normally not a subject for discussion in a JFK forum as it’s mostly irrelevant except possibly in connection to an alleged affair of JFK and Marilyn Monroe.
I
Nevertheless, from Bakers and Trulys WC testimony neither saw anything in
Oswalds hands such as a bottle.
Maybe they were fibbing. IDKWhere would the " Oswald had a coke in his hands" story originated if not from Baker?.....
After Baker had told Curry that he had seen Lee in the TSBD after the murder of JFK and told the chief that the cold blooded bastard who had shot a brother officer in cold blood, was such a fiend that he was calmly drinking a coke after he had just shot the president. And Baker stated that in his sworn, written affidavit, that the fiend was "drinking a coke" when he encountered him in the 2nd floor lunchroom.
"Walt apparently disagrees with the PM=Oswald theory and seems to think my attempt to construct a timeline for PM is analogous to some act that"
produces nothing lasting and solid.... IOW.... The theory that PM=Oswald theory and seems to think my attempt to construct a timeline for PM is is not worth wasting the time spent to read the goofy theory...
I'm sorry that I have to be so brutally honest Zeon.... But I feel compelled to move the stalemate along.....I've been trying for over 50 years and my candle is burning low.