Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Alan Ford]

I go don't give a damn if Dan is (or is not) a WC defender.   He seems to be more candid, open minded and honest, than You Mr Ford.  I'd really love for you to make a solid case that Lee was outside watching the P.Parade at the time JFK was murdered, but alas ....I can clearly see that  you are trying to read your wishful thoughts into the hastily scribbled and truncated notes.

Anybody who is truly seeking the truth should be totally unconcerned about another person's [i"]religion"[/i] as long as the other person is candid and honest and is willing to honestly examine the facts.   One of your major problems Mr Ford lies in your refusal to hear and examine any facet of a subject that conflicts with your views.

~Shrug~

[Dan O'meara]

Mr O'Meara knows the interrogation reports are irreconcilable with one another and is blaming the fact on Mr Oswald, whose guilt he is convinced of.

Mr O'Meara is a WC defender pretending to be a critic of the official story.

How do you defend something by criticising it?

The utterly moronic quality of some of your statements is astounding.

I am totally open-minded about all this and willing to have my outlook completely changed by compelling argument.
At this moment in time I'm convinced Oswald was involved in the assassination and look at his recorded statements in that light.
I find your rabid defence of something for which there is zero evidence repellent and have fun making a fool of you.
There is no evidence for the identification of Prayer Man as Oswald, equally there is no evidence for the Hoax.
You blindly argue both cases with no regard for Reason or even sanity.
Your fantastical ravings are funny.
And that's all they are.

[Alan Ford]

How do you defend something by criticising it?

The utterly moronic quality of some of your statements is astounding.

I am totally open-minded about all this and willing to have my outlook completely changed by compelling argument.
At this moment in time I'm convinced Oswald was involved in the assassination and look at his recorded statements in that light.
I find your rabid defence of something for which there is zero evidence repellent and have fun making a fool of you.
There is no evidence for the identification of Prayer Man as Oswald, equally there is no evidence for the Hoax.
You blindly argue both cases with no regard for Reason or even sanity.
Your fantastical ravings are funny.
And that's all they are.

So! Your "totally open-minded" position at present is:

1. Yes, Mr Oswald did indeed claim to have gone outside and watched the P. Parade, but...
2. Mr Oswald, being guilty, was lying because he needed to construct a false alibi.

Question!

What guilty deed do you think Mr Oswald is trying to hide by lying about having eaten lunch on one and then watched the P. Parade outside?

[Dan O'meara]

So! Your "totally open-minded" position at present is:

1. Yes, Mr Oswald did indeed claim to have gone outside and watched the P. Parade, but...
2. Mr Oswald, being guilty, was lying because he needed to construct a false alibi.

Question!

What guilty deed do you think Mr Oswald is trying to hide by lying about having eaten lunch on one and then watched the P. Parade outside?

This same question has already been answered in full.

What evidence do you have confirming the reality of the Hoax?

[Alan Ford]

"All you have on video, Mr O'Meara, is Mr Oswald confirming his location at the time of the assassination: Texas School Book Depository. He's happy to confirm that he was there and nowhere else."

All I have is Oswald on video confirming he was in the building at the time of the assassination, corroborated by Holmes. The insane mental gymnastics involved in arguing that out on the front steps of the building is 'still in the building' are spooky. Nobody looks at it that way except for the zealous PM crew. The front door is right there, on one side is in the building on the other is outside the building. Please don't respond to this comment as I've heard all I need to hear about it.

Bumping this to show everyone the truly remarkable journey Mr O'Meara has been on.

He has spent months and months dismissing as "insane mental gymnastics" the very suggestion that Mr Oswald claimed to have been outside watching the P. Parade.

His current position? Read for yourselves, folks!

The important part of his false claim is that he was outside watching the P. parade, the implication being that he was outside the TSBD as JFK passed by.

 

[Alan Ford]

This same question has already been answered in full.

No, Mr O'Meara, it has been answered in full vagueness.

All you have told us is that you
-------------believe that Mr Oswald had a role in the assassination
-------------don't know where Mr Oswald was at the time of the assassination.

So: What specific deed or activity do you think Mr Oswald is trying to hide by lying about having eaten lunch on one and then watched the P. Parade outside?

What evidence do you have confirming the reality of the Hoax?

How about we start with the shadow down Mr Lovelady's side in the Wiegman film? You know, the one you still can't explain. 

[Dan O'meara]

Bumping this to show everyone the truly remarkable journey Mr O'Meara has been on.

He has spent months and months dismissing as "insane mental gymnastics" the very suggestion that Mr Oswald claimed to have been outside watching the P. Parade.

His current position? Read for yourselves, folks!

 

You've got problems.
You couldn't have picked a better quote to highlight the depth of the problems you've got:

"All I have is Oswald on video confirming he was in the building at the time of the assassination, corroborated by Holmes. The insane mental gymnastics involved in arguing that out on the front steps of the building is 'still in the building' are spooky. Nobody looks at it that way except for the zealous PM crew. The front door is right there, on one side is in the building on the other is outside the building."

Just to paraphrase the context of the quote:
There is film of Oswald being questioned by reporters as he is led through the corridors of the DPD.
One reporter asks him where he was at the time of the shooting and Oswald basically says he was in the TSBD.
Obviously, this is a problem for someone like Alan, who is a devout Prayer Man advocate.
To have Oswald himself saying he was in the building at the time of the shooting is a massive fly in the ointment for the PM devotees.
How could Alan reconcile these polar opposites - his rabid belief Oswald was on the front steps of the TSBD at the time of the shooting and the contradictory words of his hero?
What followed wasn't the most mental thing Alan's ever said but it was right up there.

Alan's argument was that if you are stood on the steps of the TSBD you are still in the TSBD!!
That's right folks...
If you're stood outside the front door you are still in the building!!!
These were the "insane mental gymnastics" being referred to.