Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Dan O'meara]

I'll type this real slow, Mr O'Meara, so you have a chance of keeping up:

The 2FLRE hoax was developed---by the 'investigating' authorities, after the assassination---on the basis of a real visit by Mr Oswald, before the assassination, to the second floor lunchroom for a coke.

The reason you're still obsessing over 2010 talking points is that you still can't find a credible alternative candidate for Prayer Man, you still can't explain the shadow down Mr Lovelady's side in Wiegman, and you're still in denial about Mr Oswald's claim to have gone "outside to watch P. Parade". You're as tragically lost as the original Mr Doyle was!

As I thought - evasion.
Explain Westbrook Scranton's recollection of Mrs Reid claiming to see LHO with a coke in hand. Reid was claiming this within an hour of the assassination.

[Dan O'meara]

The 2FLRE hoax was developed---by the 'investigating' authorities, after the assassination---on the basis of a real visit by Mr Oswald, before the assassination, to the second floor lunchroom for a coke.

Explain this:

The 11/24/63 report on Oswald's interrogation by Special Agent Bookhout contains the following:

"Oswald stated that on November 22, 1963, at the time of the search of the Texas School Book
Depository building by Dallas police officers, he was on the second floor of said building,
having just purchased a Coca-Cola from the soft-drink machine, at which time a police officer
came into the room with pistol drawn and asked him if he worked there. Mr. Truly was present
and verified that he was an employee and the police officer thereafter left the room and
continued through the building. Oswald stated that he took this Coke down to the first floor
and stood around and had lunch in the employees’ lunch room."

Why does Oswald have a coke in this version of the 'hoax' but it disappears by the time Baker and Truly testify before the WC?

You say Nat Pinkston was involved, what do you have to back this up?
You say the hoax was developed by "the 'investigating' authorities, after the assassination". What do you have to back this up?

More Fantasia.

[Zeon Mason]

If PM is Oswald, why did not the conspirators blacken out that west corner using the same whatever black masking that is alleged by Mr. Ford to be creating a shadow on the side of Lovelady!

[Dan O'meara]

If PM is Oswald, why did not the conspirators blacken out that west corner using the same whatever black masking that is alleged by Mr. Ford to be creating a shadow on the side of Lovelady!

What a great question.

Add that to the list of questions you're going to have to avoid Mr Ford.

Welcome back

[Dan O'meara]

Here's a challenge for all of you who believe the 2FLRE was a hoax.

In proposing the Hoax you are proposing something 'real'. It must have been created by someone - who was it created by? Who is orchestrating the Hoax? It must have participants - who is involved in the Hoax and to what extent?
How did the Hoax come into being?
What is the timeline for it?

You have reached into thin air and pulled out a new reality called the 2FLRE Hoax. Defend it. Prove it exists as a thing in it's own right.
If you believe in the 2FLRE Hoax don't just sit in the shadows waiting for these awkward questions to go away so you can just carry on believing it without any proof of it's reality.
Get your heads together.
Come up with something concrete.

[Alan Ford]

Explain this:

The 11/24/63 report on Oswald's interrogation by Special Agent Bookhout contains the following:

"Oswald stated that on November 22, 1963, at the time of the search of the Texas School Book
Depository building by Dallas police officers, he was on the second floor of said building,
having just purchased a Coca-Cola from the soft-drink machine, at which time a police officer
came into the room with pistol drawn and asked him if he worked there. Mr. Truly was present
and verified that he was an employee and the police officer thereafter left the room and
continued through the building. Oswald stated that he took this Coke down to the first floor
and stood around and had lunch in the employees’ lunch room."

Why does Oswald have a coke in this version of the 'hoax' but it disappears by the time Baker and Truly testify before the WC?

You say Nat Pinkston was involved, what do you have to back this up?
You say the hoax was developed by "the 'investigating' authorities, after the assassination". What do you have to back this up?

More Fantasia.

Yawn. The evolution of the interrogation reports has been covered in great detail multiple times in multiple venues since 2013, Mr O'Meara. But you wouldn't know that, seeing as you're stuck in 2010. Educate yourself, man!

[Alan Ford]

If PM is Oswald, why did not the conspirators blacken out that west corner using the same whatever black masking that is alleged by Mr. Ford to be creating a shadow on the side of Lovelady!

I'm not alleging it, Mr Mason, I'm stating the plain fact. If you disagree as to its being a plain fact, do feel free offer your own explanation of how that can be a real shadow.



I, Mr Zeon Mason, have an explanation for the shadow down Mr Lovelady's right side in Wiegman: _________________________________________ 

Over to you, sir!