Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[John Iacoletti]

Still crying about being schooled John. You're the only one getting any lessons round here. 

Nice display of arrogance, but that doesn't justify your claim that "information previously furnished to the F. B. I."  is a reference specifically to Reid's FBI statement given on 11/26/63.

[Dan O'meara]

Nice display of arrogance, but that doesn't justify your claim that "information previously furnished to the F. B. I."  is a reference specifically to Reid's FBI statement given on 11/26/63.

Just teasing because you're being so petulant 

[John Iacoletti]

Just teasing because you're being so petulant 

You're the one who gets petulant.  Every time your misinformation gets corrected.

[Dan O'meara]

Unfortunately they forgot "information previously furnished to the F. B. I." in the Carolyn Arnold's statement (page 7 in the CE 1381 bundle) to cover her 12:25 sighting of Oswald -- LOL

This obviously brings us to Arnold's FBI statement four days after the assassination:

"Mrs. R. E. ARNOLD, Secretary, Texas School Book Depository, advised she was in her office on the second floor of the building on November 22, 1963, and left that office between 12:00 and 12:15 PM, to go downstairs and stand in front of the building to view the Presidential Motorcade. As she was standing in front of the building, she stated she thought she caught a fleeting glimpse of LEE HARVEY OSWALD standing in the hallway between the front door and the double doors leading to the warehouse, located on the first floor. She could not be sure that this was OSWALD, but said she felt it was and believed the time to be a few minutes before 12:15 PM.

She stated thereafter she viewed the Presidential Motorcade and heard the shots that were fired at the President; however, she could furnish no information of value as to the individual firing the shots or any other information concerning OSWALD, whom she stated she did not know and had merely seen him working in the building."

The important point is that this has Arnold outside the TSBD @ 12:15pm. This ties in with the CE 1381's of the other employees Arnold was with, three of whom state 12:15 as the time they left the TSBD. This would also seem to tie in with Reid's statement about the younger girls leaving before her, Reid herself getting out in time to stand on the steps "for a few minutes" before the parade came onto Houston.

[Dan O'meara]

Combined with this part makes it even more exiting:

As she was standing in front of the building, she stated she thought she caught a fleeting glimpse of LEE HARVEY OSWALD standing in the hallway between the front door and the double doors leading to the warehouse, located on the first floor.

But wait, wasn't Oswald on the sixth floor stacking boxes around 12:15?

Then he apparently chills out in the Domino room where he sees Jarman and Norman entering the building (around 12:25pm), something that appears to be independently corroborated by Jarman and Norman themselves. While Oswald is 'wandering' around the first floor Arnold Rowland is keeping an eye on 'the man with the rifle' on the sixth floor.
Go figure.

[John Tonkovich]

You're the one who gets petulant.  Every time your misinformation gets corrected.

It's kind of a pattern with Mr O'meara.
He posts. We rebut. He insults.

[Dan O'meara]

It's kind of a pattern with Mr O'meara.
He posts. We rebut. He insults.

This is a baseless lie. Utterly unfounded.
On this forum I've constantly presented Ideas, theories and arguments that are there to be critiqued, the whole point being that those who know better than I do can show me where I'm going wrong. Something that has happened on a number of occasions and something I have always gladly welcomed. I've challenged the Prayer Man theory because I don't like, what I perceive to be, the mentality behind it, I've created "The First Shot" thread and presented a range of arguments to try and establish when the first shot occurred as I believe it's important to establish a consensus about something this fundamental and I've created the "Nix Illusion" thread to demonstrate to researchers such as yourself why the inconsistency you believe exists between the Zapruder and Nix films is not actually there.
Not once have you ever rebutted a single point I've made. Not once. Instead you provide cryptic, meaningless comments that contribute nothing. So I called you out on it and now I find you on another thread crying about it. Embarrassing.
I'm constantly putting things out there to be knocked down which is something I welcome. Genuine debate.
You just hide in the shadows sniping.
I'm here to learn and to challenge. I'm not here to score points in some imaginary game.