The Wounding of James Tague Refutes the Lone-Gunman Theory

[Tim Nickerson]

Did you write this reply in the 1970s and just forget to hit Post until today? You know we have hard scientific evidence that the skull x-rays have been altered, right? Have you heard about the optical density analyses that have been done on the x-rays?

The autopsy photos and X-Rays were confirmed as authentic by the HSCA's 21 member panel of photographic analysis experts and by the HSCA Medical panel. The photos were authenticated by the photographer who took them and the X-Rays were authenticated by the radiologist responsible for them as well as by the technician who took them.

Ebersole testified that the X-Rays in the National Archives are the ones that he supervised the taking of just prior to the start of the autopsy on Kennedy. He positively identified them. As Jerrol Custer noted "the technician takes the X-Rays. The Radiologist reads the X-Rays. Plain and simple."  Custer believed that the X-Rays were genuine. He was shown three X-Rays of the skull during his ARRB testimony and he confirmed that he had taken them. Those X-Rays were (1),(2),and (3) in the list below.

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md13/html/Image01.htm

[Tim Nickerson]

Walthers mentioned that he had seen bullet strikes on curbs before. Also, the mark was deep enough, had enough substance missing, that Walthers assumed it could have been the source of the fragment that stung Tague and cut his face. And, the first photos did in fact show material missing from the mark--it was not just a smudge.

"These metal smears were spectrographically determined to be essentially lead with a trace of antimony. No copper was found. The lead could have originated from the lead core of a mutilated metal-jacketed bullet such as the type of bullet loaded into 6.5 millimeter Mannlicher-Carcano cartridges or from some other source having the same composition.

The absence of copper precluded the possibility that the mark on the curbing section was made by an unmutilated military-type full metal-jacketed bullet such as the bullet from Governor Connally's stretcher, C1, or the bullet or bullets represented by the jacket fragments, c2 and c3, found in the Presidential limousine. Further, the damage to the curbing would have been much more extensive if a rifle bullet had struck the curbing without first having struck some other object. Therefore, this mark could not have been made by the first impact of a high velocity rifle bullet."

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62372#relPageId=126&tab=page

[Gerry Down]

The autopsy photos and X-Rays were confirmed as authentic by the HSCA's 21 member panel of photographic analysis experts and by the HSCA Medical panel. The photos were authenticated by the photographer who took them and the X-Rays were authenticated by the radiologist responsible for them as well as by the technician who took them.

Ebersole testified that the X-Rays in the National Archives are the ones that he supervised the taking of just prior to the start of the autopsy on Kennedy. He positively identified them. As Jerrol Custer noted "the technician takes the X-Rays. The Radiologist reads the X-Rays. Plain and simple."  Custer believed that the X-Rays were genuine. He was shown three X-Rays of the skull during his ARRB testimony and he confirmed that he had taken them. Those X-Rays were (1),(2),and (3) in the list below.

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md13/html/Image01.htm

That document is from 1966. The x-rays and pictures and the number of each could have been faked by 1966.

[Tim Nickerson]

That document is from 1966. The x-rays and pictures and the number of each could have been faked by 1966.

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md13/html/Image00.htm

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md13/html/Image10.htm

[John Tonkovich]

That document is from 1966. The x-rays and pictures and the number of each could have been faked by 1966.

A failure to understand the evidence does not render the evidence invalid; it merely indicates a problem with comprehension.

Exhibit A: David Lifton

[Gary Craig]

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md13/html/Image00.htm

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md13/html/Image10.htm

Regardless, 3 important photos are not included in the Archives.

The photo of the inside of the chest cavity. It could/would have shown the path and direction of the bullet that struck JFK in the

back.

The photos of the bullet wound in JFK's skull located slightly above and slightly to the right of the EOP. The autopsy doctors asked they

 be taken of the inside and outside of the skull, with the brain removed and the scalp refracted.


The location of both wounds were changed after the autopsy.


Gerald Ford changed the description of the location of the back wound in the final draft of the WCR; from JFK's back to the back of the base

of JFK's neck. It raised the entrance above the alleged exit in the front of the throat. Makes a shot from 60 feet up on 6th floor SE corner

TSBD more palatable/believable.


The Clark Panel found a trail of metal particles across the top of JFK's skull when the autopsy materials were re-examined in the late

sixties. They concluded the autopsy doctors missed the rear entrance wound in JFK's skull by 4 inches. They changed it's official location

from the EOP to the cowlick.

[John Tonkovich]

Regardless, 3 important photos are not included in the Archives.

The photo of the inside of the chest cavity. It could/would have shown the path and direction of the bullet that struck JFK in the

back.

The photos of the bullet wound in JFK's skull located slightly above and slightly to the right of the EOP. The autopsy doctors asked they

 be taken of the inside and outside of the skull, with the brain removed and the scalp refracted.


The location of both wounds were changed after the autopsy.


Gerald Ford changed the description of the location of the back wound in the final draft of the WCR; from JFK's back to the back of the base

of JFK's neck. It raised the entrance above the alleged exit in the front of the throat. Makes a shot from 60 feet up on 6th floor SE corner

TSBD more palatable/believable.


The Clark Panel found a trail of metal particles across the top of JFK's skull when the autopsy materials were re-examined in the late

sixties. They concluded the autopsy doctors missed the rear entrance wound in JFK's skull by 4 inches. They changed it's official location

from the EOP to the cowlick.

So, you have "experts", who keep debating over two different entry points in the skull, and a third back/back of neck wound.

Seems like we're talking about three wounds.
And there were three empty shells.
What does that tell you?