Vincent Bugliosi's Reclaiming History. 53 pieces of Evidence against Oswald.

[Michael T. Griffith]

Bugliosi's propaganda book has been shredded by JFK assassination scholars. See, for example, the following:

https://themantikview.com/pdf/Boo_Review.pdf (Dr. David Mantik's 21-page critique of Bugliosi's book)

http://www.reclaiminghistory.org/

http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.php/Essay_-_Debugging_Bugliosi

http://www.ctka.net/death_of_naa.html

[John Mytton]

Bugliosi's propaganda book has been shredded by JFK assassination scholars. See, for example, the following:

https://themantikview.com/pdf/Boo_Review.pdf (Dr. David Mantik's 21-page critique of Bugliosi's book)

http://www.reclaiminghistory.org/

http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.php/Essay_-_Debugging_Bugliosi

http://www.ctka.net/death_of_naa.html

Wow, JFK assassination scholars, that's hilarious, how many of your "scholars" have even looked at more than a handful of different cases and how many have actually stepped into a courtroom and either prosecuted or defended anybody? Bugliosi had the vast courtroom experience of prosecuting over 100 varying cases which included over 20 murder cases and therefore understood how to analyse eyewitnesses and evidence, whereas the majority of the "JFK assassination scholars" as compared to Bugliosi have virtually zero experience outside of this little bubble and show time and time again absolutely no deductive reasoning skills.

Btw Bugliosi successfully prosecuted 105 cases out of 106  felony jury trials, how many court cases have you or any of your mates won?

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Wow, JFK assassination scholars, that's hilarious, how many of your "scholars" have even looked at more than a handful of different cases and how many have actually stepped into a courtroom and either prosecuted or defended anybody? Bugliosi had the vast courtroom experience of prosecuting over 100 varying cases which included over 20 murder cases and therefore understood how to analyse eyewitnesses and evidence, whereas the majority of the "JFK assassination scholars" as compared to Bugliosi have virtually zero experience outside of this little bubble and show time and time again absolutely no deductive reasoning skills.

Btw Bugliosi successfully prosecuted 105 cases out of 106  felony jury trials, how many court cases have you or any of your mates won?

JohnM

So, just because Bugs won those cases, he's automatically right about this one... Is that what you are saying?

[John Iacoletti]

Bugliosi had vast courtroom experience and therefore knew how to BS a jury.

[Martin Weidmann]

Bugliosi had vast courtroom experience and therefore knew how to BS a jury.

Indeed.

What "John Mytton" fails to understand or simply ignores is that Bug's doorstopper is, just like the WC report before it, nothing more than a one sided prosecutorial narrative which has remained uncontested by a defense narrative for obvious reasons. The veractity and quality of the arguments brought forward by the prosecutor have never been scrutinized.

50% of a story is no story at all.

[Jerry Freeman]

BugZ spent 20 years writing several chapters on what the WR says in one line or two. Save the time and trouble and just turn to page 1461 where he wrote--- "Oswald did it" 

[Michael T. Griffith]

It's interesting to note that Bugliosi was a big-time conspiracy theorist when it came to the RFK assassination. He was heavily involved with conspiracy theorists who were filing lawsuits to get the LAPD to release their RFK assassination materials. Bugliosi did a lot of the investigative work that supported the legal briefs in those lawsuits. He spoke on college campuses and told his audiences that RFK was killed by a conspiracy, and that the LAPD had suppressed evidence that Sirhan Sirhan could not have fired all the shots and was not even in position to fire the shot that hit RFK in the head.

But, when it came to the JFK assassination, Bugliosi was a blind, robotic denier of conspiracy, perhaps because of his association with David Atlee Phillips, a CIA officer who was seen meeting with Oswald in Dallas in 1963. To get an idea of just how bad Bugliosi's book is, check out these articles:

https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-reviews/bugliosi-vincent-reclaiming-history-aguilar

http://www.reclaiminghistory.org/

https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Debugging_Bugliosi.html

https://themantikview.com/pdf/Boo_Review.pdf