Knickers has tried to get away with this nonsense for years.
Good to know.
"Wrong" -- LOL
Day was very specific about the reason ridges were left on the barrel:
Mr. BELIN. When you lift a print is it then harder to make a photograph of that print after it is lifted or doesn't it make any difference?
Mr. DAY. It depends. If it is a fresh print, and by fresh I mean hadn't been there very long and dried, practically all the print will come off and there will be nothing left. If it is an old print, that is pretty well dried, many times you can still see it after the lift. In this case I could still see traces of print on that barrel.
Mr. BELIN. You mean the remaining traces of the powder you had when you got the lift, Exhibit 637, is that what you mean by the lift of the remaining print on the gun?
Mr. DAY. Yes, sir. Actually it was dried ridges on there. There were traces of ridges still on the gun barrel.
Yet clean as a whistle when Latona, your expert(!) witness, received it. Game over.
Wow, where did Day hide it for four days?
From my post above, there is absolutely no doubt that Oswald's prints came directly from C2766, therefore Oswald touched the rifle.
JohnM
