If Oswald Was The Assassin, Did He Plan His Escape From The TSBD Very Well?

[Michael Walton]

The bullet hit at the junction where the neck meets the back.
So strictly speaking, it was a neck/back in-shoot.

I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, Bill.

[Bill Chapman]

I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, Bill.

'Junction' as described here
https://www.spine-health.com/video/spinal-motion-segment-c7-t1-cervicothoracic-junction-animation

Besides, that was the Queen Mary; no jump seat.. leaving the Connally character too high. Visually misleading.

[Thomas Graves]

Tommy sees some things clearly, but when it comes to the assassination, he exhibits selective amnesia and ignores incredibly powerful evidence of multiple shooters. But that's just an opinion based on decades of sporadic study of the case. Tommy gets that Hoover had many nefarious connections, not the least of which was the prime suspect, his dear friend and neighbor Lyndon Baines Johnson. These two criminals used to walk their dogs together. Both were facing extinction in 1964 if JFK was elected to a second term. Is it possible LBJ orchestrated the assassination to eliminate the two major criminal cases pending against him?

Dear James,

Incredibly strong bullshit "analysis" of the evidence, rather.

Like for example mistaking, in a profile x-ray, the fracture patterns in JFK's skull as "evidence" of two shots to his head, a solo shot from the front, or a frangible bullet from God knows where, when they, along with his tie's fibers pointing outwards at the bullet hole's edges, actually offer the strongest evidence that JFK's head was struck once and once only, and from behind, at that.

Misinterpreting the iconic image of JFK's head going, relatively slowly, "BACK AND TO THE LEFT!" as being a result of a strike from "the front" instead of being the combined effects of 1) JFK's catastrophic neuromuscular reaction while sitting and wearing a rigid back brace, and 2) a Newton's Third Law "jet effect" resulting from a good portion of his brains' being blown out a palm-sized hole in the upper right part of his skull.

And, of course, the fact that many witnesses mistakenly believed the last two shots were significantly closer together than the first and the second shots for the simple reason that for about 11 seconds, Dealey Plaza was a virtual echo chamber, resounding with the echos caused by three sets of supersonic bullet "cracks" and muzzle blast "booms," not only confusing almost everybody as to what was going on and where it might be coming from, but messing up their recollections of the tragic event, as well.

Etc, ad nauseam...

--  MWT 

[Jim Brunsman]

Oh Tommy, that was one of the most ridiculous posts I've ever seen regarding this issue. Misinterpreting the Z-film?? Really? The president's head goes relatively slowly back and to the left??? That is absolutely true...if the film is run in slow motion. Goodness, that assertion annihilates your already damaged credibility. I will never forget seeing the Z-film for the first time on "Good Night America." What we all saw was anything but a slow back and to the left motion. It was violent, startling and clearly a shot from the right front. Please spare me that extremely tired bullshit of the jet effect and neuromuscular reaction. That makes as much sense as the SBT.

Then you make matters worse by somehow arriving at the false opinion that the last two shots were not closer together than the previous shots. The dictabelt and eyewitness testimony say you are mistaken about this also. But then, I don't see any evidence of just three shots. That's just Specter and Hoover force feeding a false narrative to frame "Lee Hardly."

I've been to Dealey Plaza and it helps because a lot of lone nutter myths are quickly eviscerated. Sure, there were likely echos and reverberations. But when you're near the underpass, I think it would be very clear where the shots originated. Several witnesses reported shots from two locations, and I have no trouble believing that. But using echos to discredit the ear witnesses? Not going to work on me.

One more thing: the x-rays and autopsy photos are forgeries and it would take another huge thread to explain all the crimes committed at the autopsy and afterward. It was a stinking cover-up from the start, and I'm astounded that lone nutters find all this innocent.

[Thomas Graves]

Oh Tommy, that was one of the most ridiculous posts I've ever seen regarding this issue. Misinterpreting the Z-film?? Really? The president's head goes relatively slowly back and to the left??? That is absolutely true...if the film is run in slow motion. Goodness, that assertion annihilates your already damaged credibility. I will never forget seeing the Z-film for the first time on "Good Night America." What we all saw was anything but a slow back and to the left motion. It was violent, startling and clearly a shot from the right front. Please spare me that extremely tired bullshit of the jet effect and neuromuscular reaction. That makes as much sense as the SBT.

Then you make matters worse by somehow arriving at the false opinion that the last two shots were not closer together than the previous shots. The dictabelt and eyewitness testimony say you are mistaken about this also. But then, I don't see any evidence of just three shots. That's just Specter and Hoover force feeding a false narrative to frame "Lee Hardly."

I've been to Dealey Plaza and it helps because a lot of lone nutter myths are quickly eviscerated. Sure, there were likely echos and reverberations. But when you're near the underpass, I think it would be very clear where the shots originated. Several witnesses reported shots from two locations, and I have no trouble believing that. But using echos to discredit the ear witnesses? Not going to work on me.

One more thing: the x-rays and autopsy photos are forgeries and it would take another huge thread to explain all the crimes committed at the autopsy and afterward. It was a stinking cover-up from the start, and I'm astounded that lone nutters find all this innocent.

LOL!

Oh, my dear James ...

Compared to if his head had been struck in the front by a 6.5 mm (or bigger) bullet travelling about 1900 fps (and no jet effect was involved, of course)?

Yes, relatively slowly.

D'oh

--  MWT 

[Jim Brunsman]

Nope, compared to nothing. Just common sense is needed. But you don't believe your own lyin' eyes and the mountain of evidence that the fatal shot came from in front. That's your prerogative. But if I see that opinion, I will challenge it because I believe it's a travesty of justice that the crime of the last century was hung on "Lee Hardly." Quite possible Oswald shot nobody on 11/22/63 just as he said. Not saying that's a certainty; only a real possibility.

[Paul May]

Nope, compared to nothing. Just common sense is needed. But you don't believe your own lyin' eyes and the mountain of evidence that the fatal shot came from in front. That's your prerogative. But if I see that opinion, I will challenge it because I believe it's a travesty of justice that the crime of the last century was hung on "Lee Hardly." Quite possible Oswald shot nobody on 11/22/63 just as he said. Not saying that's a certainty; only a real possibility.

4th request for this “mountain of evidence” for a frontal shot. You bring it up virtually each time you post. Let’s see it.