JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
If Oswald Was The Assassin, Did He Plan His Escape From The TSBD Very Well?
Thomas Graves:
--- Quote from: Otto Beck on June 10, 2020, 09:35:03 AM ---Are you OK?
"The Bug" is dead.
--- End quote ---
Otto,
Were you born in East Germany by any chance?
Could explain your pro-KGB, anti-CIA outlook and your apparent inability to understand the nuances of the English language.
When and where did you debate David Von Pein on the "MC"?
-- MWT ;)
Thomas Graves:
--- Quote from: Otto Beck on June 10, 2020, 10:44:42 AM ---Pro-KGB outlook?
Jim summed you up nicely in just one word:
Warped.
--- End quote ---
Otto,
OMG, am I confusing you with one of your gurus?
Could it be that you're just virulently anti-CIA, especially as regards the assassination of JFK by a self-described Marxist?
-- MWT ;)
PS Warped, eh? Hmm... Is that anything like ... brainwashed by Ruskie propaganda?
PPS If the "MC" wasn't Oswald's, how many people do you figure were involved in making it appear that it was, i.e., in the Backyard Photos, in the documents, in the planting of it in the TSBD, etc?
Just a couple?
Jim Brunsman:
Tommy sees some things clearly, but when it comes to the assassination, he exhibits selective amnesia and ignores incredibly powerful evidence of multiple shooters. But that's just an opinion based on decades of sporadic study of the case. Tommy gets that Hoover had many nefarious connections, not the least of which was the prime suspect, his dear friend and neighbor Lyndon Baines Johnson. These two criminals used to walk their dogs together. Both were facing extinction in 1964 if JFK was elected to a second term. Is it possible LBJ orchestrated the assassination to eliminate the two major criminal cases pending against him?
Michael Walton:
--- Quote from: Paul May on June 09, 2020, 06:22:36 PM ---Michael, I’m not a big fan of re-enactments for obvious reasons. They’re unnecessary. We have the ZAP film tell us what we need to know. If nothing else the tie nick tells us a bullet exited JFK’s neck.
--- End quote ---
Paul, the Zapruder film is obviously a great piece of evidence showing what happened in real time. It does not show, however, where the bullets hit Kennedy and Connolly. Based on their reactions to the shots hitting, we can establish a sequence of when the shots hit.
Accident reconstruction has been at the forefront of any criminal investigation. This is why the FBI reenacted the shooting sequence. There's no doubt that they used the autopsy notes and photos to establish where the bullets hit Kennedy. If you look at the sticker on the above photo, they have it placed almost exactly where the back autopsy photo shows the hole - slightly to the right and in the upper back. They probably used any photos they had on hand of the jacket with the hole on it as well.
Further, no wound on the back of the neck was discovered. Therefore, the other white sticker shows the frontal throat wound moved to the back of the neck.
I believe this reenactment took place in May of 64. The WC lawyers hadn't gotten a hold of it to massage the truth yet. Gerald Ford hadn't yet written in the final report the "...back [of the neck]." I'm sure they were still trying to figure out how a bullet hits Kennedy in the back and slightly to the right, then exits UPWARD in the front of the neck, then continues on to hit Connolly in the armpit [also a lower trajectory].
Question - surely if one of your loved ones was killed in a car wreck, you'd want the authorities to get to the bottom of this if things were not clear cut, right? Surely you'd want them to perform an accident reenactment to try and determine what actually happened if, for example, the accident was not captured on film, right?
But anyway back to Dallas. The main thing we do know is this - and many years after the fact. The powers that be had one mandate for the FBI and WC - only one person is supposed to have pulled off 3 shots to kill Kennedy and wound Connolly. Leave absolutely no doubt of this mandate. This mandate trickled down to everything - the WC's conclusions and so on.
So I ask you again. Do you not find this the least bit intriguing...interesting...suspicious?
Bill Chapman:
The bullet hit at the junction where the neck meets the back.
So strictly speaking, it was a neck/back in-shoot.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version