Cowlick Vs Occipital Protuberance

[John Tonkovich]

As you "interpret" it, I'm sure.

--  MWT 

Have you seen the survey?

[Gerry Down]

I think i got my angles wrong in the opening post of this thread. The 17.5 degree angle refers to the SBT. The head shot was at 12 degrees.

What angle sideways did the headshot come in at? The SBT is 10 degrees (relative to the midline of the limo). What angle did the headshot come in at relative to the midline of the limo?

[Mike Orr]

We needed the real photos taken that night instead of Drawings by ' Ida Dox ' . Lt. Commander William Bruce Pitzer lost his life over supposedly having photos as per Dennis David of the head wounds on JFK .

[John Tonkovich]

In Max Holland's mocked-up, laser-measured reenactment of the shooting of that first shot at about 1.4 seconds before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133, ... the boxes were not in the way.

If you were the assassin up there at that window and ... 1) not wanting to shoot while the limo was still on Houston Street for fear of being spotted and shot while in the act of shooting, ... and ... 2) you knew there was a big oak tree partially obscuring Elm Street from your view, ... I think you'd be tempted to squeeze of a shot before the limo disappeared behind the tree, knowing that you'd probably be able to get off one or two more shots if, by some miracle, you missed on that "easy", five-miles-per-hour, reach-out-and-touch-somebody one.

-- MWT 

Max Holland. Government apologist.
CIA apologist.
The first shot hit the tree.

[Thomas Graves]

Max Holland. Government apologist.
CIA apologist.
The first shot hit the tree.

John Tonkovich,

Xxxxxxx troll, or just really, really gullible?

Do try to get it straight, won't you? The first shot glanced not a tree branch, but the traffic light "mast arm" about 1.4 seconds before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133.

--  MWT 

[Thomas Graves]

Holland explains the lack of a dent on the mask arm was because the bullet struck at a shallow-angle strike. However, this would mean minimal deflection. But Holland wants a major deflection from the mask arm to make the bullet (or fragments from it) go down Elm Street towards the manhole cover and bridge.

Holland's graphic.

Haag experiment showing minimal deflection from glancing shot trajectory.

Myers 3D projection showing amount of deflection     needed to make Holland's theory work.

Dear Jerry,

Holland believes the bullet glanced the mast arm sufficiently hard to cause it to lose its copper jacket, thereby explaining why the bullet smear found on the curb by Tague had no copper in it.

Holland also says that a possible reason the hypothesized glancing "dent" on the mast arm couldn't be found some fifty years later was because the mast arm had been repainted five times (iirc) since the assassination, and those coats of sloppily-applied paint had filled in the dent sufficiently as to make it undetectable.

--  MWT 

[John Tonkovich]

Dear Jerry,

Holland believes the bullet glanced the mast arm sufficiently hard to cause it to lose its copper jacket, thereby explaining why the bullet smear found on the curb by Tague had no copper in it.

Holland also says that a possible reason the hypothesized glancing "dent" on the mast arm couldn't be found some fifty years later was because the mast arm had been repainted five times (iirc) since the assassination, and those coats of sloppily-applied paint had filled in the dent sufficiently as to make it undetectable.

--  MWT 

Holland and Myers. Hacks.