Ms Carolyn Arnold

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ms Carolyn Arnold  (Read 11604 times)

Offline Louis Earl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 147
Re: Ms Carolyn Arnold
« Reply #21 on: May 30, 2020, 12:59:32 AM »
I just want to verify something.   You believe that woman on the Facebook account is 77 years old? 

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Ms Carolyn Arnold
« Reply #22 on: May 30, 2020, 11:16:56 PM »
Mr. BALL - That you saw Oswald again at approximately 11 a.m. on the sixth floor?.
Mr. DOUGHERTY - That's right.
Mr. BALL - But you didn't see him again after that, is that your testimony?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - Yes.
Mr. BALL - Is that the truth?
Mr. DOUGHERTY - That's right.
   ???

"Dougherty was not reliable, due to no fault of his own."

---------Mr Tim Nickerson, April 14, 2019 https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?topic=1900.0

 :D

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Ms Carolyn Arnold
« Reply #23 on: May 30, 2020, 11:27:56 PM »
So!

Mr Dom Bonafede, New York Herald Tribune quoting Mr Lovelady on the Altgens photograph, 24 May 1964:

'Several people saw me. That lady shielding her eyes works here on the second floor.'"

Which lady shielding her eyes in the Altgens photograph can Mr Lovelady be pointing out to Mr Bonafede when he says this?



Anyone?  :-\

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Ms Carolyn Arnold
« Reply #24 on: May 31, 2020, 01:41:17 AM »
"Dougherty was not reliable, due to no fault of his own."

---------Mr Tim Nickerson, April 14, 2019 https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?topic=1900.0

 :D

I stand by that.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Ms Carolyn Arnold
« Reply #25 on: May 31, 2020, 05:17:08 PM »
I stand by that.

So Mr Dougherty's claim before the WC not to have seen Mr Oswald after seeing him at approx. 11am on the sixth floor is not reliable. Got it!  Thumb1:

Offline Nicholas Turner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 378
Re: Ms Carolyn Arnold
« Reply #26 on: May 31, 2020, 09:09:48 PM »
You don’t know which was true. You don’t even know if the Toff double-hearsay is correct.

I asked earlier about whether the Toff interview was witnessed or verified but didn't get an answer. What's the provenance?
« Last Edit: May 31, 2020, 09:12:47 PM by Nicholas Turner »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Ms Carolyn Arnold
« Reply #27 on: June 01, 2020, 06:03:23 AM »
Your made-up BS is not “substance “.