Why Did Oswald Kill JFK?

[Jim Brunsman]

Sorry Tommy boy, the premise of your question is totally false. Oswald, as he clearly tried to tell reporters on multiple occasions, killed nobody. He was clearly set up as his movements in the months prior to the assassination clearly attest. But let's get to the crux of the issue. If we believe the total nonsense produced by the lone nut community, we will be suckered into exactly the trap JEdgar Hoover wanted us in. Anyone with evidence contrary to the impossible SBT was harassed, bullied and threatened by Specter, Belin and others. What about the Parkland and Bethesda witnesses testimony? Tommy are you one of the many ignoring the consistent reports of these vital witnesses? Can anyone produce evidence of a fatal head shot from behind? If Oswald killed JFK, wouldn't there be an exit wound on the FRONT of the president's body??? No such wound was seen by ANY witness. The EXIT hole on the BACK of JFK's head that the medical witnesses reported has not been widely publicized by the pathetic press. The history books should be burned if they buy into this SBT nonsense. Shame on you for fomenting this scientific impossibility...

Expecting a smug and irrelevant reply from Mr. Graves, officer of disinformation...

[Bill Chapman]

"And nobody who knows anything about the actual shooting"

 

"Craig Roberts was a former Marine sniper who later wrote a book on the JFK assassination called “Kill Zone.” Roberts visited the 6th floor window of the Texas School Book Depository and instantly realized that Oswald could not have performed the shooting feat because he knew that he himself could not. And he was a professional.

Roberts interviewed Sergeant Carlos Hathcock, the former senior instructor at the Marines Corps Sniper Instruction School at Quantico, Virginia. Roberts asked Hathcock if he thought Oswald could have done what the Warren Commission said he did. Hathcock said no.
Hathcock reconstructed the assassination at Quantico: the angle, moving target, time limit etc. he told Roberts, “I don’t know how many times we tried it, but we couldn’t duplicate what the Warren Commission said Oswald did.

Again, we are talking about professionals. Men who completely outclass Oswald in raw shooting ability. But further, these are professional assassins who practice their skills almost daily.”

Seems it's better to be lucky than good

[Bill Chapman]

As you said, nobody here (in this thread) said that Marina's actions were the sole reason.

And nobody who knows anything about the actual shooting believes it was done in "world class time and accuracy."  Oswald completely missed with his first shot; took between 6-8 seconds to fire the next two shots, and missed with his second. It took him three shots and, in my opinion, more than eight seconds to kill JFK.

Hardly world class shooting. If it was world class shooting JFK would have been "taken out" with the first shot.

'missed with his first shot'
'and missed with his second'
>Huh?

[Thomas Graves]

"There was a total of about 11 seconds between the first and the third shots."

 

"Regarding that missed shot, how else are we to understand why the bullet smear on the chipped curb down by James Tague didn't have any copper in it except for the very real possibility that the bullet lost its copper jacket when it glanced off the arm of the traffic light?"

 

Mr. LIEBELER. Do you have any idea which bullet might have made that mark?
Mr. TAGUE. I would guess it was either the second or third. I wouldn't say definitely on which one.
Mr. LIEBELER. Did you hear any more shots after you felt yourself get hit in the face?
Mr. TAGUE. I believe I did.
Mr. LIEBELER. You think you did?
Mr. TAGUE. I believe I did.
Mr. LIEBELER. How many?
Mr. TAGUE. I believe that it was the second shot, so I heard the third shot afterwards.

Your "rebuttals" are little laughing emoticons?

That's all you got?

LOL!

Btw, did you catch where Tague said, "I would guess" (once), "I wouldn't say definitely" (once), and "I believe" (three times)?

Under the circumstances (i.e., excitement/shock of the moment; reverberating echoes of: 1) the supersonic "cracks," and 2) the muzzleblasts) and with the passage of time, it's easy to see how he could guess wrong ...

--  MWT

[Thomas Graves]

Sorry Tommy boy, the premise of your question is totally false. Oswald, as he clearly tried to tell reporters on multiple occasions, killed nobody. He was clearly set up as his movements in the months prior to the assassination clearly attest. But let's get to the crux of the issue. If we believe the total nonsense produced by the lone nut community, we will be suckered into exactly the trap JEdgar Hoover wanted us in. Anyone with evidence contrary to the impossible SBT was harassed, bullied and threatened by Specter, Belin and others. What about the Parkland and Bethesda witnesses testimony? Tommy are you one of the many ignoring the consistent reports of these vital witnesses? Can anyone produce evidence of a fatal head shot from behind? If Oswald killed JFK, wouldn't there be an exit wound on the FRONT of the president's body??? No such wound was seen by ANY witness. The EXIT hole on the BACK of JFK's head that the medical witnesses reported has not been widely publicized by the pathetic press. The history books should be burned if they buy into this SBT nonsense. Shame on you for fomenting this scientific impossibility...

Expecting a smug and irrelevant reply from Mr. Graves, officer of disinformation...

Brunsman,

What's with the "Tommy boy" and "officer of disinformation" insults, punk?

--  MWT 

[Thomas Graves]

"And nobody who knows anything about the actual shooting"

 

"Craig Roberts was a former Marine sniper who later wrote a book on the JFK assassination called “Kill Zone.” Roberts visited the 6th floor window of the Texas School Book Depository and instantly realized that Oswald could not have performed the shooting feat because he knew that he himself could not. And he was a professional.

Roberts interviewed Sergeant Carlos Hathcock, the former senior instructor at the Marines Corps Sniper Instruction School at Quantico, Virginia. Roberts asked Hathcock if he thought Oswald could have done what the Warren Commission said he did. Hathcock said no.
Hathcock reconstructed the assassination at Quantico: the angle, moving target, time limit etc. he told Roberts, “I don’t know how many times we tried it, but we couldn’t duplicate what the Warren Commission said Oswald did.

Again, we are talking about professionals. Men who completely outclass Oswald in raw shooting ability. But further, these are professional assassins who practice their skills almost daily.”

Craig Roberts, the guy who evidently couldn't afford a proofreader, and who believes The Rothschilds were behind the assassination?

--  MWT 

[Jim Brunsman]

Seems like you treat others around here with the same kind of disrespect so I thought a little instant karma was appropriate. I don't see any answers to the questions I posed. How about some substance instead of nonsense???