Author Topic: Why Did Oswald Kill JFK? (Read 14770 times)

Nicholas Turner · « **Reply #24 on:** May 23, 2020, 02:11:01 PM »

Quote from: Peter Goth on May 23, 2020, 02:09:02 PM

I aware of that and you said...

"rather 'not having the power or ability to change or improve"

you doubted one and preferred the other...I asked why

No you didn't, you asked how I knew that. I explained why I doubted he meant that. Is this really worth arguing about?

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #24 on:** May 23, 2020, 02:11:01 PM »

Peter Goth · « **Reply #25 on:** May 23, 2020, 02:12:56 PM »

Quote from: Nicholas Turner on May 23, 2020, 02:11:01 PM

No you didn't, you asked how I knew that. I explained why I doubted he meant that. Is this really worth arguing about?

actually you didn't - you explained there are two meanings and you chose one. no reason why,

Nicholas Turner · « **Reply #26 on:** May 23, 2020, 02:14:26 PM »

Quote from: Peter Goth on May 23, 2020, 02:12:56 PM

actually you didn't - you explained there are two meanings and you chose one. no reason why,

I did. It's because that's what the word means.

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #26 on:** May 23, 2020, 02:14:26 PM »

Peter Goth · « **Reply #27 on:** May 23, 2020, 03:43:51 PM »

Quote from: Nicholas Turner on May 23, 2020, 02:14:26 PM

I did. It's because that's what the word means.

yet so, innocuous.

Gary Craig · « **Reply #28 on:** May 23, 2020, 06:57:15 PM »

Quote from: Nicholas Turner on May 23, 2020, 12:46:06 PM

Doubt he meant sexual impotence but rather 'not having the power or ability to change or improve a situation' as defined in the Cambridge Dictionary.

Maybe.

Blaming a nagging wife as the motivation for LHO's alleged assassination of JFK is on par with claiming the shooting was done, in world class time and accuracy, by a mediocre out of practice shooter with a worn, rusty, misaligned surplus WWII piece of junk $12 dollar rifle.

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #28 on:** May 23, 2020, 06:57:15 PM »

Bill Chapman · « **Reply #29 on:** May 23, 2020, 07:54:12 PM »

Quote from: Walt Cakebread on May 20, 2020, 01:47:46 AM

None of the above.... I used my God given brain.....

And you've been sitting on it ever since

Nicholas Turner · « **Reply #30 on:** May 23, 2020, 09:02:50 PM »

Quote from: Gary Craig on May 23, 2020, 06:57:15 PM

Maybe.

Blaming a nagging wife as the motivation for LHO's alleged assassination of JFK is on par with claiming the shooting was done, in world class time and accuracy, by a mediocre out of practice shooter with a worn, rusty, misaligned surplus WWII piece of junk $12 dollar rifle.

One of many factors which led to the assasination maybe, but unlikely (I would think) to be the sole reason.

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #30 on:** May 23, 2020, 09:02:50 PM »

Steve M. Galbraith · « **Reply #31 on:** May 25, 2020, 12:03:14 AM »

Quote from: Nicholas Turner on May 23, 2020, 09:02:50 PM

One of many factors which led to the assasination maybe, but unlikely (I would think) to be the sole reason.

As you said, nobody here (in this thread) said that Marina's actions were the sole reason.

And nobody who knows anything about the actual shooting believes it was done in "world class time and accuracy." Oswald completely missed with his first shot; took between 6-8 seconds to fire the next two shots, and missed with his second. It took him three shots and, in my opinion, more than eight seconds to kill JFK.

Hardly world class shooting. If it was world class shooting JFK would have been "taken out" with the first shot.

JFK Assassination Forum

News: