The Smell of Gunpowder and the Smell of Bigfoot

[Jack Trojan]

Wow, you must have read some ill-informed quasi-historical / quasi-political tracts by Joachim Joesten, Mark Lane, Josiah Thompson, Jim Garrison, James "Jumbo Duh" DiEugenio, Jefferson Morley, Bill Simpich, John Newman, Peter Dale Scott, et al. ad nauseam, and seen "JFK: The Hysterical Movie," too!

Go have a major colonic, and then try reading "Wedge: The Secret War Between the FBI and CIA".

Then move up to Tennent H.Bagley's "Spy Wars" and "Ghosts of the Spy Wars."

All three of those works are free-to-read on the Internet.

(Funny how you realize that KGB-boy Putin made Trump our president, but don't seem to be able to connect the dots between that event and ... well ... "The Big Event")

--  MWT 

Nice try. The KGB could never have set up the motorcade route or got Oswald a job at the TSBD or switched coffins or controlled the autopsy and on and on. Did they help the DPD sheep dip Oswald? Did they also set up Thomas Arthur Vallee in Chicago? You need to get out more and just let the "evil evil evil"...Deep State thing go.

-- MWJ

[Joe Elliott]

OP said:  "Eyewitnesses, Earwitnesses, Nose witnesses, are not reliable."

They ARE reliable so long as their 'evidence' jibes with the Warren Report.

The Pro LN witness reports are, in general, among the least reliable ‘evidence’ of Oswald being the lone assassin. For instance, three shells being found on the sixth floor is a better indication that three shots were fired than a majority of the witnesses remembering that there were three shots. No, I don’t consider Pro-LN witnesses as being reliable and Pro-CT witnesses unreliable. I consider all eyewitnesses to be unreliable, although they are sometimes, no doubt, correct. But when are they correct and when are they incorrect? I rather rely on evidence, not the witnesses.

[Thomas Graves]

Nice try. The KGB could never have set up the motorcade route or got Oswald a job at the TSBD or switched coffins or controlled the autopsy and on and on. Did they help the DPD sheep dip Oswald? Did they also set up Thomas Arthur Vallee in Chicago? You need to get out more and just let the "evil evil evil"...Deep State thing go.

-- MWJ 

The way I see it, Oswald went rogue and got lucky, not shooting-wise, but location-wise.

But you do raise an interesting question:  How much did Russophile Ruthie really like Russia?

And that George DeMohrenschildt-- was he really a long-term KGB "illegal" as Clare Edward Petty, based on his close reading of some WW II VENONA decrypts, suspected in the mid-1970s, according to Richard Russell in "The Man Who Knew Too Much"?

And Marina!  Was she, as some people suspect, really a KGB "honeytrapper" in Leningrad before she met her Knight In Shining Armor?

And was Ivan Obyedkov, the Soviet Embassy "security guard" who volunteered the made-radioactive-by-KGB name "Kostikov" to a bad Russian speaking and a bad English speaking Oswald impersonator over a sure-to-be-tapped-by-CIA phoneline in Mexico City really a Kremlin-loyal triple-agent, as James Angleton intimated in his top-secret June, 1975, Church Committee testimony?

What say you, Comrade?

--  MWT 

[Jerry Freeman]

The way I see it, Oswald went rogue and got lucky, not shooting-wise, but location-wise.

                  Keep 'em coming!

[Thomas Graves]

                  Keep 'em coming!

Jerry,

Is that part of your old Catskills vaudeville act, the one where they had to lob the rotten tomatoes in, softball-style, rather than chuck 'em in, high and hard?

--  MWT 

[Bill Chapman]

I would like to see that. And a few more things.

1.   Richard Trask said that the image on the Wiegman film is “frozen”. It does not move. If this is false, this would be easy to prove. One could show a brief snippet of the Wiegman film, or something like the following:

http://users.skynet.be/mar/Eng/Headshot/back&left-eng.htm#Sommet

showing consecutive frames of the Wiegman film, showing the “cloud” moving like a real cloud, possible a smoke cloud. I suspect the CT failure to come up with such is a strong indication that the image is frozen.

2.   There has been good video of small smoke clouds produced by a single shot rifle. Can CTers show a video where such a smoke cloud hangs around for a few seconds? They can choice as calm a day as they like, as long is the film is taken outdoors. Can a “frozen cloud” be recreated or is the Wiegman film the one and only example that has and can ever be produced?

I'd like to see a CT 'smoking gun' re-creation showing smoke rising from a rifle and remaining intact enough to be visible much above the rifle, let alone the treetop.
 

This musket demo shows the barrel-smoke already thinning out
 

[Louis Earl]

Were you replying to my post?