Then went outside to watch P. parade

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Then went outside to watch P. parade  (Read 71725 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade
« Reply #28 on: May 15, 2020, 07:10:05 PM »
It was so nice to not have Graves around to do his Graves Gallop for the last several months.  We'll see how long he lasts before being sent to posting jail yet again.

Offline Nicholas Turner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 378
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade
« Reply #29 on: May 15, 2020, 07:11:28 PM »
It was so nice to not have Graves around to do his Graves Gallop for the last several months.  We'll see how long he lasts before being sent to posting jail yet again.

 :)

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade
« Reply #30 on: May 15, 2020, 07:12:32 PM »
An accurate one.

How do you define "accurate estimate" in this context?

1)  Something that tends to implicate Oswald?

2)  Something that tends to exonerate Oswald?

--  MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: May 15, 2020, 07:13:01 PM by Thomas Graves »

Offline Nicholas Turner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 378
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade
« Reply #31 on: May 15, 2020, 07:21:33 PM »
How do you define "accurate estimate" in this context?

1)  Something that tends to implicate Oswald?

2)  Something that tends to exonerate Oswald?

--  MWT  ;)

Neither.

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade
« Reply #32 on: May 15, 2020, 07:23:49 PM »
Neither.

Then how will you know if it's accurate?

--  MWT  ;)

Offline Nicholas Turner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 378
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade
« Reply #33 on: May 15, 2020, 07:32:36 PM »
Then how will you know if it's accurate?

--  MWT  ;)

You keep asking questions, trying to deflect from what is quite a simple point, that a suggestion was made (not by you) that stopping to wipe finger prints from the rifle would mean Oswald needed to fly down the stairs rather than take a brisk walk. I am asking for a fact to support that suggestion. If you can't provide one I'm not sure why you are commenting or what you are trying to achieve.
« Last Edit: May 15, 2020, 07:59:11 PM by Nicholas Turner »

Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade
« Reply #34 on: May 15, 2020, 10:05:14 PM »
You keep asking questions, trying to deflect from what is quite a simple point, that a suggestion was made (not by you) that stopping to wipe finger prints from the rifle would mean Oswald needed to fly down the stairs rather than take a brisk walk. I am asking for a fact to support that suggestion. If you can't provide one I'm not sure why you are commenting or what you are trying to achieve.

You should be asking why flying down the stairs automatically makes you winded? Don't get hung up on semantics. My "guessitmate" that Oswald was moving quickly down the stairs was because approx. 90 seconds after the shots rang out, Oswald was encountered in the second-floor lunchroom by Dallas police officer Marrion L, who did not notice that Oswald was winded. Obviously I can't prove it was impossible for Oswald to have done that, only that IMO it was improbable. The onus is on you to rebuke my guessimate by demonstrating it was possible. Otherwise, I'm not married to it and it doesn't make Oswald a LN by default.

If you can take 3 shots, wipe down the rifle of all your prints, ditch it as shown in the Alyea film and get to the 2nd floor in 90 seconds I will concede that it was possible. But I still wouldn't believe that's how it went down because that's just 1 piece of  evidence, of many, that casts doubt on Oswald being the shooter. So instead of tying myself into knots trying to make the LN narrative fit, I go with Occam's Razor and the patsy hypothesis fits like a glove. But that's JMHO, believe what you like.